2024考研英语（一）真题.docx

2024考研英语（一）真题 Section II Reading Comprehension Part A Directions: Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points) How can the train operators possibly justify yet another increase to rail passenger fares? It has become a grimly reliable annual ritual: every January the cost of travelling by train rises, imposing a significant extra burden on those who have no option but to use the rail network to get to work or otherwise. This years rise, an average of 2.7 per cent, may be a fraction lower than last years, but it is still well above the official Consumer Price Index (CPI) measure of inflation. Successive governments have pertted such increases on the grounds that the cost of investing in and running the rail network should be borne by those who use it, rather than the general taxpayer. Why, the argument goes, should a car-driving pensioner from Lincolnshire have to subsidise the daily commute of a stockbroker from Surrey? Equally there is a sense that the travails of commuters in the South East, many of whom will face among the biggest rises, have received too much attention compared to those who must endure the relatively poor infrastructure of the Midlands and the North. However, over the past12 months, those commuters have also experienced some of the worst rail strikes in years. It is all very well train operators trumpeting the improvements they are making to the network, but passengers should be able to expect a basic level of service for the substantial sums they are now paying to travel. The responsibility for the latest wave of strikes rests on the unions. However, there is a strong case that those who have been worst affected by industrial action should receive compensation for the disruption they have suffered. The Government has pledged to change the law to introduce a minimum service requirement so that, even when strikes occur, services can continue to operate. This should form part of a wider package of measures to address the long-running problems on Britains railways. Yes, more investment is needed, but passengers will not be willing to pay more indefinitely if they must also endure cramped, unreliable services, punctuated by regular chaos when timetables are changed, or planned maintenance is managed incompetently. The threat of nationalisation may have been seen off for now, but it will return with a vengeance if the justified anger of passengers is not addressed in short order. 21.【题干】The author holds that this years increase in rail passengers fares_____. 【选项】 A.will ease train operations burden. B.has kept pace with inflation. C.is a big surprise to commuters. D.remains an unreasonable measure. 【答案】D 22.【题干】The stockbroker in 2 is used to stand for_____. 【选项】 A.car drivers B.rail travellers C.local investors D.ordinary taxpayers 【答案】B 23.【题干】It is indicated in 3 that train operators_____. 【选项】 A.are offering compensations to commuters. B.are trying to repair relations with the unions. C.have failed to provide an adequate service. D.have suffered huge losses owing to the strikes. 【答案】C 24.【题干】If unable to calm down passengers, the railways may have to face_____. 【选项】 A.the loss of investment. B.the collapse of operations. C.a reduction of revenue D.a change of ownership. 【答案】D 25.【题干】Which of the following would be the best title for the text? 【选项】 A.Who Are to Blame for the Strikes? B.Constant Complaining Doesnt Work C.Can Nationalization Bring Hope? D.Ever-rising Fares Arent Sustainable 【答案】D Last year marked the third year in a row of that Indonesia’s bleak rate of deforestation has slowed in pace. One reason for the turnaround may be the countrys antipoverty program. In 2007, Indonesia started phasing in program that gives money to its poorest residents under certain conditions, such as requiring people to keep kids in school or get regular medical care. Called conditional cash transfers or CCTs, these social assistance programs are designed to reduce inequality and break the cycle of poverty. Theyre already used in dozens of countries worldwide. In Indonesia, the program has provided enough food and medicine to substantially reduce severe growth problems among children. But CCT programs dont generally consider effects on the environment. In fact, poverty alleviation and environmental protection are often viewed as conflicting goals, says Paul Ferraro, an economist at Johns Hopkins University. Thats because economic growth can be correlated with environmental degradation, while protecting the environment is sometimes correlated with greater poverty. However, those correlations dont prove cause and effect. The only previous study analyzing causality, based on an area in Mexico that had instituted CCTs, supported the traditional view. There, as people got 。