电子文档交易市场
安卓APP | ios版本
电子文档交易市场
安卓APP | ios版本

2022年考博英语-华东交通大学考试题库及模拟押密卷15(含答案解析)

25页
  • 卖家[上传人]:公****
  • 文档编号:469730054
  • 上传时间:2023-07-31
  • 文档格式:DOCX
  • 文档大小:30.05KB
  • / 25 举报 版权申诉 马上下载
  • 文本预览
  • 下载提示
  • 常见问题
    • 1、2022年考博英语-华东交通大学考试题库及模拟押密卷(含答案解析)1. 单选题Gregory Currie, a professor of philosophy eat the University of Nottingham, recently argued in The New York Times that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests that people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy” or other great books.Actually, there is such evidence. Raymond Mar, a psychologist at York University in Canada, and Keith Oatley, a professor of cognitive psycho

      2、logy at the University of Toronto, reported in studies published in 2006 and 2009 that individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize (起共鸣)with them and view the world from their perspective. This link persisted even after the researchers factored in the possibility that more empathetic individuals might choose to read more novels.Recent research in cognitive science, psychology and neuroscience has demonstrated that deep reading of books is a d

      3、istinctive experience, very different from the information-driven reading we do on the Web. Although deep reading does not, strictly speaking, require a conventional book, the built-in limits of the printed page are uniquely conducive to the deep reading experience. A books lack of hyperlinks allows the reader to remain fully immersed in the narrative, without having to make such decisions as whether to click on a link or not.That immersion is supported by the way the brain handles language rich

      4、 in sensory detail and emotional and moral complexity, by creating a mental representation that draws on the same brain regions that would be active if the scene were unfolding in real life. The emotional situations and moral dilemmas that are the stuff of literature are also vigorous exercise for the brain, propelling us inside the heads of fictional characters and even increasing our real-life capacity for empathy.This is not reading as many young people are coming to know it. Their reading, m

      5、ostly done onscreen, is pragmatic and instrumental. If we allow our children to believe reading onscreen is all there is, we will have deprived them of an enjoyable and enlightening experience that will enlarge them as people. Instead molding our education around young peoples attachment to digital devices and onscreen habits, we need to show them some place theyve never been to, a place only deep reading can take them to.1. Prof, Gregory Currie argues that( ).2.The studies of Raymond Mar and Ke

      6、ith Oatley show that( ).3.Deep reading of paper books compared with reading on the web( ).4.It can be learned from the passage that the author( ).问题1选项A.literature doesnt show peoples moral or social standardsB.only good literature shows peoples moral and social valuesC.reading fiction wont improve people morally or sociallyD.only reading great books benefits people morally and socially问题2选项A.empathetic people are more likely to read novels oftenB.empathetic people have a better perspective on t

      7、he worldC.reading fiction encourages people to be more persistentD.reading fiction helps people understand others better问题3选项A.requires readers to do more careful thinkingB.enables readers to stay absorbed in the storyC.gives readers many links to other materialsD.allows readers to choose their future reading问题4选项A.supports use of digital devices in classroomB.prefers reading onscreen to reading paper booksC.takes a positive approach to education reformsD.holds a negative attitude toward reading

      8、 onscreen【答案】第1题:C第2题:D第3题:B第4题:D【解析】1.细节事实题。 根据题干定位到文章首段,“recently argued in The New York Times that we ought not to claim that literature improves us as people, because there is no “compelling evidence that suggests that people are morally or socially better for reading Tolstoy or other great books.”最近在纽约时报上提出,我们不应该声称文学提高了我们作为人的水平,因为没有“令人信服的证据表明,阅读托尔斯泰或其他伟大著作的人在道德上或社会上更优秀”。A选项“文学不能体现出人们的道德和社会水平”,B选项“只有好的文学可以体现人们的道德和社会水平”,C选项“阅读小说不会提高人们的道德或社会地位”,D选项“只有读伟大的书籍,才能使人在道德和社会上受益”。因此,C选项符合题意。2.细节事实题。根据

      9、题干定位到原文第二段的第二句话“individuals who often read fiction appear to be better able to understand other people, empathize (起共鸣)with them and view the world from their perspective.” 人经常读小说似乎能更好地理解他人,与他们起共鸣,从他们的角度看待这个世界。A选项“具有同理心的人更有可能经常阅读小说”,B选项“有同理心的人对世界有更好的看法”,C选项“读小说能使人更有毅力”, D选项“读小说可以帮助人们更好地理解别人”。因此,D选项符合题意。3.细节事实题。根据题干定位到原文第三段,“A books lack of hyperlinks allows the reader to remain fully immersed in the narrative, without having to make such decisions as whether to click on a link or not.”一本书没有超链接,读者可以完全沉浸在叙述中,而不必决定是否点击链接。A选项“要求读者做更细致的思考”,B选项“使读者在故事中保持专注”,C选项“给读者提供许多其他材料的链接”,D选项“允许读者选择未来的读物”。因此,B选项符合题意。4.观点态度题。根据题干定位到原文最后一段,“If we allow our children to believe reading onscreen is all there is, we will have deprived them of an enjoyable and enlightening experience that will enlarge them as people.”如果我们允许我们的孩子相信在屏幕上阅读就是一切,我们就剥夺了他们一种愉快而有启发性的体验,而这种体

      《2022年考博英语-华东交通大学考试题库及模拟押密卷15(含答案解析)》由会员公****分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《2022年考博英语-华东交通大学考试题库及模拟押密卷15(含答案解析)》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

      点击阅读更多内容
    最新标签
    监控施工 信息化课堂中的合作学习结业作业七年级语文 发车时刻表 长途客运 入党志愿书填写模板精品 庆祝建党101周年多体裁诗歌朗诵素材汇编10篇唯一微庆祝 智能家居系统本科论文 心得感悟 雁楠中学 20230513224122 2022 公安主题党日 部编版四年级第三单元综合性学习课件 机关事务中心2022年全面依法治区工作总结及来年工作安排 入党积极分子自我推荐 世界水日ppt 关于构建更高水平的全民健身公共服务体系的意见 空气单元分析 哈里德课件 2022年乡村振兴驻村工作计划 空气教材分析 五年级下册科学教材分析 退役军人事务局季度工作总结 集装箱房合同 2021年财务报表 2022年继续教育公需课 2022年公需课 2022年日历每月一张 名词性从句在写作中的应用 局域网技术与局域网组建 施工网格 薪资体系 运维实施方案 硫酸安全技术 柔韧训练 既有居住建筑节能改造技术规程 建筑工地疫情防控 大型工程技术风险 磷酸二氢钾 2022年小学三年级语文下册教学总结例文 少儿美术-小花 2022年环保倡议书模板六篇 2022年监理辞职报告精选 2022年畅想未来记叙文精品 企业信息化建设与管理课程实验指导书范本 草房子读后感-第1篇 小数乘整数教学PPT课件人教版五年级数学上册 2022年教师个人工作计划范本-工作计划 国学小名士经典诵读电视大赛观后感诵读经典传承美德 医疗质量管理制度 2
    关于金锄头网 - 版权申诉 - 免责声明 - 诚邀英才 - 联系我们
    手机版 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号 | 经营许可证(蜀ICP备13022795号)
    ©2008-2016 by Sichuan Goldhoe Inc. All Rights Reserved.