电子文档交易市场
安卓APP | ios版本
电子文档交易市场
安卓APP | ios版本

cognitivelinguisticslecture2

9页
  • 卖家[上传人]:大米
  • 文档编号:456177012
  • 上传时间:2023-06-05
  • 文档格式:DOC
  • 文档大小:85.50KB
  • / 9 举报 版权申诉 马上下载
  • 文本预览
  • 下载提示
  • 常见问题
    • 1、Lecture Two Conceptual Metaphors2.1 Metaphors: from figures of speech to conceptual systemsTraditionally, metaphors have been regarded as figures of speech, i.e. as ornamental devices used in rhetorical style. However, expressions like “the foot of the mountain”, 重视, 思路, 桌子腿and瓶颈also play an important part in everyday language. Moreover, philosophers and cognitive linguists have shown that metaphors are powerful cognitive tools for our conceptualization of abstract categories. Metaphors are perv

      2、asive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action. Our ordinary conceptual system is fundamentally metaphorical in nature. Metaphors as a figure of speechSee Yang Zhong: pp.85-92. 可以从语言学讲义中复制Metaphor is a figure of speech in which a word or phrase is applied to an object or action to which it is not literally applicable. (The New Oxford Dictionary of English) The basic sentence form is A is B. For instance, John is an ass and The sky is crying. What is described is usually r

      3、eferred to as the target (e.g., John and sky) while the describing element (ass and crying) the source.Metaphor has traditionally been based on the notions similarity or comparison between the literal and the figurative meaning of an expression. In the above example, the similarity lies in the quality of being stubborn.The three components of metaphor are tenor, vehicle, and ground. The working mechanism of metaphor is as follows: X (tenor) is like Y (vehicle) in respect of Z (ground).Based upon

      4、 the substitution or comparison view of metaphor, I. A. Richards and M. Black developed the so-called interaction theory of metaphor. They maintained that the essence of metaphor lies in an interaction between a metaphorical expression and the context in which it is used. In our first example, the interaction can be described as a semantic clash or tension between the metaphorically used category ass and the context of a human being John, and this results in the interpretation of the sentence as

      5、 John is as stubborn as an ass / John is an ass in respect of being stubborn. Account of the formation of metaphorsTraditional account:1) Substitution view: Metaphor is the use of an expression to stand for a literal expression with an equal meaning. For example, the use of ass for a stubborn person. This is the view held by most traditional rhetoricians and literary critics.2) Comparison view: Metaphor is the comparison between two things in resemblance or it is the elliptical form of simile.3)

      6、 Interaction view: Metaphor is the interaction between two semantic items or it is the application of the imaginative meaning of the secondary item to the primary item.New account:1) Semantic account: Metaphor is a semantic deviation and it is the result of a systemic violation of semantic rules.2) Pragmatic account: According to Searle, when it is impossible to make sense of the literal meaning of words or the meaning of sentences, we will have to turn to search for the speakers meaning or the

      7、meaning of utterances. (Lin Shuwu, 1997)Conventionalized metaphorsMetaphor is not just a figure of speech in literature but also pervasive in everyday language. The examples of words denoting body-parts in the upper half of the human body in Figure 3.2 are usually not recognized as being metaphorical by language users, thus they have been called conventionalized, lexicalized or “dead” metaphor. The logic behind these labels is that (p.117) According to Ullmann and Leech, the most frequent types

      8、of conventionalized metaphors are: concretive metaphors, animistic metaphors, humanizing metaphors, and synaesthetic metaphors (ibid.). Compare with the more inventive, expressive and unexpected metaphors devised by writers, esp. poets. Metaphors as a cognitive instrumentThat metaphors act as “cognitive instruments” means that metaphors are not just a way of expressing ideas by means of language, but a way of thinking about things. Lakoff & Johnson (1980: 7f) argue that we do not just exploit th

      9、e metaphor +TIME IS MONEY+ linguistically, but we actually think of, or conceptualize, the so-called “target” category (or target domain) TIME via the “source” category (source domain) MONEY when we use the following phrases: p.118.In the cognitive linguistic view, metaphor is defined as understanding one conceptual domain (target domain) in terms of another conceptual domain (source domain). (Kvecses, 2002: 4) Some examples of conceptual metaphor: An argument is war; Love is a journey; Theories are buildings; Ideas are food; etc.What does it mean exactly that A is understood in terms of B? The answer is that there is a set of systematic correspondences between the source and the target in the sense that constituent conceptual elements of B correspond to constituent elements of A. Technically, these conceptual correspondences are often referred to as mappings / projections. In this sense, metaphor is a type of two-d

      《cognitivelinguisticslecture2》由会员大米分享,可在线阅读,更多相关《cognitivelinguisticslecture2》请在金锄头文库上搜索。

      点击阅读更多内容
    最新标签
    监控施工 信息化课堂中的合作学习结业作业七年级语文 发车时刻表 长途客运 入党志愿书填写模板精品 庆祝建党101周年多体裁诗歌朗诵素材汇编10篇唯一微庆祝 智能家居系统本科论文 心得感悟 雁楠中学 20230513224122 2022 公安主题党日 部编版四年级第三单元综合性学习课件 机关事务中心2022年全面依法治区工作总结及来年工作安排 入党积极分子自我推荐 世界水日ppt 关于构建更高水平的全民健身公共服务体系的意见 空气单元分析 哈里德课件 2022年乡村振兴驻村工作计划 空气教材分析 五年级下册科学教材分析 退役军人事务局季度工作总结 集装箱房合同 2021年财务报表 2022年继续教育公需课 2022年公需课 2022年日历每月一张 名词性从句在写作中的应用 局域网技术与局域网组建 施工网格 薪资体系 运维实施方案 硫酸安全技术 柔韧训练 既有居住建筑节能改造技术规程 建筑工地疫情防控 大型工程技术风险 磷酸二氢钾 2022年小学三年级语文下册教学总结例文 少儿美术-小花 2022年环保倡议书模板六篇 2022年监理辞职报告精选 2022年畅想未来记叙文精品 企业信息化建设与管理课程实验指导书范本 草房子读后感-第1篇 小数乘整数教学PPT课件人教版五年级数学上册 2022年教师个人工作计划范本-工作计划 国学小名士经典诵读电视大赛观后感诵读经典传承美德 医疗质量管理制度 2
    关于金锄头网 - 版权申诉 - 免责声明 - 诚邀英才 - 联系我们
    手机版 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号 | 经营许可证(蜀ICP备13022795号)
    ©2008-2016 by Sichuan Goldhoe Inc. All Rights Reserved.