《庄子口义》研究.pdf

密 级： 学校代码：10075 分类号： 学 号：20090504 文学硕士学位论文文学硕士学位论文 《 庄 子 口 义 》 研 究 学 位 申请人：林拉溪 导师：孙拉光拉教授 学 位 类 别：文学硕士 学 科 专 业：中国古代文学 授 予 单 位：河北大学 答 辩 日 期：二〇一二年六月 Classified Index: CODE:10075 U.D.C: NO: 20090504 A Dissertation for the Degree of MLitt A Study on The Colloquial Annotation of Chuang Tzu Candidate: Lin Xi Supervisor: Prof. Sun Guang Academic Degree Applied for: Master of Literature Specialty: Ancient Chinese Literature University: HeBei University Date of Oral Examination: June, 2012 摘 要 I 摘 要 南宋艾轩学派理学家林希逸所注的《庄子口义》就义理阐释而言首次在对“三教合 一” 的自觉体认中善意地调和儒道矛盾， 就散文评点而言首次在散文技法层面对 《庄子》 进行鉴赏评析。

而本书亦自对《庄子》的涵泳中体认原著者的境界与风神，并与注者的 主体人格精神发生互动，这些都在庄学史上有草创之功 宋人治学，不重训诂，而致力于阐发义理，注者所属学派对于三教的门户之别也较 为开放包容在这两个因素的影响下，注者在阐释义理时立足《庄子》文本，使用开明 而平易的章句工夫，尽可能还原《庄子》本意；且采用同情的诠释方法，自觉意识到了 儒释道三家对重要哲学概念的阐释和学派的理论宗旨具有某种共通性， 从而善意地调解 三家矛盾 《庄子口义》对《庄子》的散文评点较多关注于技法，评点模式也多主观感悟，少 理论阐发其在《发题》中提出的“五难”基本上列举了《庄子》行文采用的形式反常化 的文学语在读者接受过程中所引发的种种现象林氏在评点中引入“文法”、“笔势”、“下 字”、“起结”等关键字对《庄子》的句法特质、篇章结构、修辞手法等进行评析，在庄学 史上具有将《庄子》研究由哲学领域导向文学领域的开创之功 注释文本中所展现的注者之精神面貌与人文情趣，亦是艾轩学派学者乃至南宋季年 士人某种心理模式的缩影对文学质素的关注，客观上使得学术的严肃性某种程度上消 解于文学的审美性， 《庄子》更多地作为文学范式而非哲学经典被注者关照；口语体的 注释文本亦客观反映了《庄子口义》的讲稿性质和受通俗文学之兴起影响的结果。

且由 于时势沉疴难起，理学家的学术态度偏向内省， 《庄子》对社会的强烈批判和对人生悲 剧的深刻体认在《口义》的解读中表现得较为隐晦，但更具有普遍性；同时文人所独有 的借以超越现实悲患的风流与自矜，在注文中也时有体现 关键词：南宋 林希逸 庄子口义 义理阐释 散文评点 注释心态 Abstract II Abstract The Colloquial Annotation of Chuang Tzu was composed by Lin Xiyi, a neo-Confucianist belonged in Aixuan School of neo-Confucianism in South Song dynasty. On the level of interpreting the ideas and contents, this work for the first time harmonized out of good will the conflictions between Confucianism and Taoism on the basis of conscious awareness of “three religions as one”. As to the prose comments, this book initiated in the appreciation and analysis of Chuang Tzu, the classic in Taoism, focusing on prose writing skills. Additionally, this book also ruminated over Chuang Tzu for the awareness of its author’s spiritual feature and realm, thus interacting with the main persona structure of Lin Xiyi. All of the above are of initial significance in the history of research on Chuang Tzu. Song scholars to some extent neglected the explanations of words whereas endeavored to focus on the annotation of ideas and contents in their research of classics. Moreover, the school of neo-Confucianism Lin Xiyi belonged in held open and tolerating attitudes towards the borders between different schools of thought. Influenced by the two elements listed above, Lin Xiyi, based on the text of Chuang Tzu, inducted liberal and plain methods in explaining the words and sentences of the classic. He attempted at the realization of Chuang Tzu's original intentions. Additionally, Lin Xiyi used the idea of sympathetic interpreting when he became aware of the similarity among Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism in terms of elucidations of important concepts and aims of theories, by which harmonized the conflictions among the three religions out of good will. The prose comments on Chuang Tzu by The Colloquial Annotation of Chuang Tzu were mainly focused on prose writing skills. The commenting mode also seemed more of subjective intuition than theoretic exposition. The “five difficulties“ listed in the Forward of the book generally covered the phenomena that would be generated in the reading of Chuang Tzu caused by the abnormalized linguistic structures of Chuang Tzu’s literary discourses. Lin Xiyi inducted keywords like “prose technique”, ”brush tendency”, ”word using”, as well as ”starting and ending” in his analysis and comments on Chuang Tzu， which made great Abstract III contribution in directing the research on Chuang Tzu from philosophical dimension to literary dimension in the context of the history of research on Chuang Tzu. Lin Xiyi’s mental outlook and humanistic temperament expressed in the interpreting texts was also a miniature of the mental mode of scholars in the Aixuan School, and even of the gentry in late Song dynasty. The concern with the literary elements objectively subdued academic seriousness by literary aestheticism, taking Chuang Tzu as a literary paradigm more than a philosophical classic. The Colloquial style of annotation also reflected the book’s properties similar to a lecture note and correspondence to the rising popular literature. Moreover, as the situation of the society was marching toward desperation, scholars generally tended to be introspective, because of which intense social critical elements and tragedies of life in Chuang Tzu was interpreted in Lin Xiyi’s work obscurely but more of universality. Also, the unique grace and pride to transcend sorrow and tragedy in life of the gentry, was presented repeatedly in his work. Keywords: South Song Dynasty Lin Xiyi The Colloquial Annotation of Chuang Tzu Annotation of Ideas and Contents Prose Analysis and Comments Interpreting Mental Attitude 目 录 IV 目 录 引 言 ·················。