雅思阅读判断题型解题方法.docx

雅思阅读判断题型解题方法雅思阅读板块题型多样，其中判断题是必考题型，本文以剑桥雅思阅读真题为例，和大家解析雅思阅读中判断题型的解题办法剑桥雅思阅读真题解析 判断题型解题办法一、判断题题干有表示比拟关系的词，考生需注意题目重点考察比拟关系常见的比拟关系词：比拟级：more/ less /adj-er than…同级比拟：as…as…/the same as…/equal/ like试题中假设出现以上比拟关系词，需标记题中的比拟对象(A 、B)，并明确比拟逻辑(如A比B更聪慧)，即可快速完成审题如：39. It is easier to find meaning in the field of science than in the field ofart.– Test 2, Cambridge IELTS 11审题步骤：1.确定比拟对象：A – field of science (科学领域)、B – field of art (艺术领域)2.确定比拟逻辑：科学的含义比艺术的含义更容易被人们理解(easier to find meaning)除了上述较明显的比拟关系词外，出题人还会使用较隐晦的叙述阐述比拟关系，用以干扰考生的判断。

因此，在审题时还需注意以下具有隐含比拟关系的叙述：prefer to…compare to/compare with/contrastsimilar to…/similarlysuperior to/inferior tounusual同样，考生在判定题干存在比拟关系后，需标记题中的比拟对象并明确比拟逻辑如：35. Teachers say they prefer suggestopedia to traditional approaches tolanguage teaching.– Test 1, Cambridge 71.确定比拟对象：A – suggestopedia(暗示教学)、B – traditional approaches(传统教学办法)2.确定比拟逻辑：暗示教学比传统教学办法更受老师喜欢(teachers say they prefer)二、借助下列2种解题思路辅助解题：1.题干中A、B存在比拟关系但原文A、B不存在比拟关系时，答案应为未提及——NOT GIVEN先看个简单的例子：题干：喜茶比星爸爸贵得多原文：我的意中人是个盖世英雄，有一天他会踏着七彩祥云，排好几个小时的队，左手拿着喜茶，右手拿着星爸爸，送过来给我喝。

分析：题干对“喜茶〞和“星爸爸〞的价格进行比拟，得出“喜茶〞更贵的结论而原文中虽有出现两家网红饮品店的名字，但并比拟两家店的产品价格，也没有提及与钱相关的信息，由此可判断该题答案为NOTGIVEN再看剑桥真题：39. It is easier to find meaning in the field of science than in the field ofart.“abstract art offers both a challenge and the freedom to play with differentinterpretations. In some ways, it’s not so different to science, where we areconstantly looking for systems and decoding meaning so that we can view andappreciate the world in a new way.〞– Test 2，Cambridge IELTS 11分析：如前文提到，该题题干的比拟关系是：科学的含义比艺术的含义更容易被人们理解。

原文也确实提到了艺术(abstractart)和科学领域(science)，但未就两个领域破译(decoding)的难易程度进行比拟，所以此题答案为NOT GIVEN2.题干A、B存在比拟关系且原文A、B也存在比拟关系时，即可排除NOTGIVEN这时，可通过比照两者的比拟方式以确定答案应为TRUE/YES还是FALSE/NO：1)如题干和原文使用相同的比拟逻辑，那么可判定题目答案为TRUE/YES如：40. In the follow-up class, the teaching activities are similar to those usedin conventional classes.“Some hours after the two-part session, there is a follow-up class at whichthe students are stimulated to recall the material presented. Once again theapproach is indirect. The students do not focus their attention on trying toremember the vocabulary, but focus on using the language to communicate (e.g.through games or improvised dramatisations). Such methods are not unusual inlanguage teaching. “– Test 1, Cambridge IELTS 7分析：通过题干中similar to(隐含比拟关系)可判定此题为比拟关系—— follow-up classes(跟进课堂)和conventionalclasses(传统课堂)两者的教学活动相似。

很多同学会由于原文没有明显比照词就两者的教学活动进行比拟而误判为NOTGIVEN但原文第3句介绍了跟进课堂为“not focus their attention on trying to remember thevocabulary, but focus on using the language tocommunicate(不死记单词，用语言来交流)〞;且第4句提到这些办法“notunusual(不罕见)〞，即这些办法十分常见由此可推断跟进课堂使用了与传统语言教学相似(similar)的教学办法，比拟逻辑一致，可判定答案为TRUE2)假设题干和原文的比拟逻辑相反或相斥，那么可判定答案为FALSE/NO如：40. A manager’s approval of an idea is more persuasive than that of acolleague.“If your project is being resisted, for example, by a group of veteranemployees, ask another old-timer to speak up for it. Cialdini is not alone inadvocating this strategy. Research shows that peer power, used horizontally notvertically, is much more powerful than any boss’s speech.〞– Test 1, Cambridge IELTS 10分析：题干就比拟对象manager(管理人员)以及colleague(同事)进行比拟：管理人员对工程的认可比同事的morepersuasive(更有说服力)。

原文第1句“如果工程被资深员工否决，那就争取另一个资历更老的人的支持〞，以此表明来自员工支持的重要性下一句提到“peerpower(同事的力量)〞比“any boss’sspeech(任何一个老板的话)〞都更加有力，即同事提出的意见比老板更有说服力，与题干的比拟逻辑相反，由此可判定答案为NO.雅思考试阅读模拟试题new weapon to fight cancer1. British scientists are preparing to launch trials of a radical new way tofight cancer, which kills tumours by infecting them with viruses like the commoncold.2. If successful, virus therapy could eventually form a third pillaralongside radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the standard arsenal against cancer,while avoiding some of the debilitating side-effects.3. Leonard Seymour, a professor of gene therapy at Oxford University, who hasbeen working on the virus therapy with colleagues in London and the US, willlead the trials later this year. Cancer Research UK said yesterday that it wasexcited by the potential of Prof Seymour's pioneering techniques.4. One of the country's leading geneticists, Prof Seymour has been workingwith viruses that kill cancer cells directly, while avoiding harm to healthytissue. "In principle, you've got something which could be many times moreeffective than regular chemotherapy," he said.5. Cancer-killing viruses exploit the fact that cancer cells suppress thebody's local immune system. "If a cancer doesn't do that, the immune systemwipes it out. If you can get a virus into a tumour, viruses find them a verygood place to be because there's no immune system to stop them replicating. Youcan regard it as the cancer's Achilles' heel."6. Only a small amount of the virus needs to get to the cancer. "Theyreplicate, you get a million copies in each cell and the cell bursts and theyinfect t。