
pedagogical_Pedagogical,Implications,of,the,Research,on,the,Application,of,Lexical,Cohesion,in,the,Teaching,of,English,Writing.docx
2页pedagogical_Pedagogical,Implications,of,the,Research,on,the,Application,of,Lexical,Cohesion,in,the,Teaching,of,English,Writing【摘要】本文以韩礼德和哈桑的词汇衔接理论为基础,同时采用霍伊的部分观点,在大学英语写作教学当中引入词汇衔接理论关键词】教学启示;词汇衔接;写作教学Writingisoneofthemostdifficulttasksalearnermayencounterandonethatfewpeoplecanfullymaster.Hence,theteachingofEnglishwritinghasarousedastronginterestamongresearchersandteachers;andvarioustheoriesandfindingsrelatedtothisfieldhavebeengraduallyintroducedintotheteachingofEnglishwriting.Inordertoconveyideaseffectively,thewritersneedtomakeuseofallsortsofwritingskillstoorganizestructuresanddevelopideas,andtheyalsoneedtospendtimeselectingappropriatewordsanduseproperdevicestokeepthetextcoherent.Hoeysaysthatwriterswhofailtoconnectwhattheyaresayinginanyparticularsentencetowhattheyhavesaidearlierarelikelytobeopentothechargeofdriftingfromtopictotopic.Accordingtohim,thefunctionsoflexicalcohesionare,inthefirstplace,toconnectsentences,nomatterwhethertheyarenearorawayfromeachother.Inthesecondplace,lexicalcohesioncanhelptointroducenewinformation.Andinthethirdplace,itcanhelptodeveloptopics.Sothewritersneedtolinkwhattheyaresayingwithwhattheyhavesaidandwhattheyaregoingtosay.HallidayandHasanalsostatethatwhenarelationofcohesionissetup,andthetwoelements,thepresupposingandthepresupposed,aretherebyatleastpotentiallyintegratedintoatext.Therefore,theroleoflexicalcohesioninEnglishwritingdeservesfurtherexploration.Thegraspoflexicalcohesioncanhelpwriterstoavoiddriftingfromtopictotopic.Keepinglexicalcohesioninmind,thewritercanconnectwhattheyaresayingtowhattheyhavealreadysaidpreviouslyandwhattheyaregoingtosay,thenhe/sheisabletoproduceacoherentcompositionandmaintainthetopic.JustasWitteandFaigleysaythatskillfulwritersarecapableofmakinguseofchainstointerweavetopicswithinthetext.Actually,theroleoflexicalcohesionismorethancohesion.Thereisnoquestionthattoexpressthesameideabymeansofvariouscohesivedevicescanenhancethevividnessoflanguageandtheimpressionofthetext.However,thefunctionsoflexicalcohesionarealwaysignoredandhaven’treceivedenoughattention.WiththepurposeofhelpingEnglishlearnersandteacherstobetterunderstandlexicalcohesionsoastoimprovewritingachievement,itprovidessomepedagogicalimplicationsfortheteachingofEnglishwriting. Firstofall,theteachers’awarenessoflexicalcohesiontheoryshouldbearoused.Theapproachofimprovingwritingachievementthroughlexicalcohesiontheoryisquitedifferentfromthetraditionaloneanditisnotveryeasyfornon-Englishmajorstomastersuchatheory.Onlywhentheteachersunderstandthetheoryabsolutely,couldtheymaketheirstudentsclearaboutit.Thentheimprovementinwritingachievementcouldberealized.Second,thedifferencesbetweenEnglishandChineselanguagesshouldbestressed.SinceEnglishisaninflectionalandderivativelanguagewhileChineseseldomhassuchchanges,somestudentsusuallygetconfusedormakemistakeswhenitcomestousingsimplelexicalrepetitionandcomplexlexicalrepetition.Meanwhiletherearealsosomedifferentexpressionsbetweenthetwolanguages,suchasacquireknowledgeratherthanlearnknowledge.Therefore,thecontrastivestudyofthesetwolanguagesisquitenecessary.Third,readingandwritingshouldbecombinedtogether.Whilereading,studentstrytofindoutthelexicalcohesivedevicesusedandhowtheyrelateeachothertoformacoherenttext.Duringreading,studentscouldnotonlyacquiremanynewwordsandexpressions,butalsotheusageofthemtoavoidnegativeL1transfer.Fourth,somestudentsfindthatitishardtoexpressthemselvessincetheydon’tknowwhattosaythentheycouldonlyrepeatthesamewordorthesamethingagainandagain,asaresult,thecontentofthetextissoemptyandboring.Tosolvesuchproblem,studentsshouldbetrainedtowritediaries.Ontheonehand,writingdiariescouldhelpstudentsdeveloptheiranalysisability.Ontheotherhand,itcouldhelpthemmemorizewhattheyhavelearned.Orelse,theycouldhavediscussionsondifferenttopicsregularly.Theymayexpresstheirideasorevenjustafewwords,expressionsrelevanttothetopicunderdiscussion.Fifth,sometimesthestudents’self-correctionsoftheirowncompositionsortheircorrectionsofclassmates’compositionsmayhaveadeeperimpressionintheirmindsthantheteacher’scorrections.Bydoingso,theymaynotmakethesamemistakesagain.Finally,students’Englishlevelsshouldalsobetakenintoaccount.DifferentlevelsofstudentsshowdifferentcapacitiesintheacceptanceofEnglishteaching.ThosewhoareproficientinEnglishcaneasilymasterthetheoryandapplyittotheirwritingscorrectlyandeffectively,whilethosewhoseEnglishisnotgoodmaybeslowmasteringthistheory.Consequently,differentteachingplansshouldbemadeaccordingtostudents’differentEnglishlevels.。
