GRE阅读隐蔽出题点初探.doc

　　通过几个具体例子来感性体会所谓隐蔽和出题点的概念先从一道 No题中的难题开始在一篇关于有氧代谢和无氧糖酵解的生命科学文章中，第三段有这样一个长达数行的难句子： With the conclusion of a burst of activity, the lactic acid level is high in the body fluids, leaving the large animal vulnerable to attack until the acid is reconverted, via oxidative metabolism, by the liver into glucose, which is then sent (in part) back to the muscles for glycogen resynthesis. 这里重点强调的不是句子本身的结构和各因素相互之间的制约联系而是因为这句难句对应了一道非常有代表性的罗马数字类型题It can be inferred from the passage that the time required to replenish muscle glycogen following anaerobic glycolysis is determined by which of the following factors?I. Rate of oxidative metabolismII. Quantity of lactic acid in the body fluidsIII. Percentage of glucose that is returned to the muscles(A) I only(B) III only(C) I and II only(D) I and III only(E) I, II, and III题目问及无氧糖酵解过程转化糖原时间和哪些因素有关？有氧代谢率和乳酸本身含量是比较明显的因素。

然而根据本人实际教学中的反馈，这道题的正确率非常低，原因主要是由于 III项的现场争议当提醒学员句子中括号包含的 in part短短两词时，往往得到的是豁然开朗的叹气试想，在考试中读到这样一个复杂冗长的句子时，没有经过训练的考生是非常难在第一时间注意到这样两个不起眼的小词的所以本题选 E选项，同时受三个因素影响再看一个同样也是生命科学文章的例子这次不是以复杂机制作为隐蔽方法文章主要内容是各种复杂理论来解释为什么动植物中的雌雄比例大致相等文中一段末句提到：Although Fisher wrote before the mathematical theory of games had been developed, his theory incorporates the essential feature of a game — that the best strategy to adopt depends on what others are doing.这句话文字难度不大，但是这里是全文唯一一次提到 game一词的地方之后文章就详细展开关于 Fisher的具体理论和机理之后提问：According to the passage, successful game strategy depends on (A) the ability to adjust one's behavior in light of the behavior of others (B) one's awareness that there is safety in numbers(C) the degree of stability one can create in one's immediate environment(D) the accuracy with which one can predict future events(E) the success one achieves in conserving and storing one's resources阅读功底一般的同学读到这里，顿时就停在那里。

因为文中竟然提到过一个理论叫 game，对他来说早已“相见不如怀念了” 此时要么全文重新检索，要么无奈的放弃这种细节定位题貌似简单，其实杀伤力是极其巨大的笔者教学过程中一直强调的是读文章时就尽量形成预测考点的感觉，不然这种细节是很难找到的，即使后期水平上升到很高的境界仔细观察对应的出题点，标点符号破折号“——”其实已经隐蔽地暗示了此处叙述的重要性正确选项A，depend on 改写为 in light of, behavior of others概括了文中的 what others are doing当然，这些隐蔽的考点不光存在于理科文章中文学评论文章中这条规律往往“老树开新花” ，有另外一种变化简单先看一个例子：Their present high standing is due to a different, more democratic political climate and to different aesthetic values: we no longer require artists to provide ideal images of humanity for our moral edification but rather regard such idealization as a falsification of the truth.这篇文章是分析了 Francoise Duparc的作品及当时不流行的原因。

短文章第一题：According to the passage, modern viewers are not likely to value which of the following qualities in a painting?(A) The technical elements of the painting (B) The spontaneity of the painting(C) The moral lesson imparted by the painting:(D) The degree to which the painting realistically depicts its subject(E) The degree to which the artist's personality is revealed in the painting作为短文章第一题的难度，本来应该是比较低，容易上手的但是实际学生反映看到题干的 modern viewers没有印象，无法在原文找到这题的合理定位，宛如遭到当头棒喝客观分析，如果题干做同义改写(Paraphrase)，题目的难度一定大大升高。

仔细分析题干，其实这个 viewers是复数泛指，类似于一大类泛指化题型这种题型最怕文中对Francoise Duparc的评价做随意归纳，把特点推广到现代观察者，因为这样的解题思路不能保证“放之四海皆准” 其实这道题的解题定位就是冒号：之后的 we（等价于题干的 modern viewers）这个词这里的同义改写即是正确选项 C最后看一个 No.9中 Emily Bronte呼啸山庄前后部分是否统一的例子这篇文章本身不仅学术含义很深，没有一定积累的考生较难理解其文字难度也绝对不低文中末尾提到：However, any interpretation that seeks to unify all of the novel’s diverse element is bound to be somewhat unconvincing. This is not because such an interpretation necessarily stiffens into a thesis (although rigidity in any interpretation of this or any novel is always a danger), but because Wuthering Heights has recalcitrant elements of undeniable power that, ultimately, resist inclusion in an all-encompassing interpretation.这个例子是最能体现 ETS出题点口味的，比上面的例子更具普遍意义。

看文章后面问题：The author of the passage would be most likely to agree that an interpretation of a novel should(A) not try to unite heterogeneous elements in the novel(B) not be inflexible in its treatment of the elements in the novel(C) not argue that the complex use of narrators or of time shifts indicates a sophisticated structure(D) concentrate on those recalcitrant elements of the novel that are outside the novel’s main structure(E) primarily consider those elements of novelistic construction of which the author of the novel was aware这道题题干中的 an和 a提示了泛指化的题型。

仔细阅读原文选段，不难发现这个离题的叙述内容出现在不成立的原因半句的括号中的让步语气中的延伸叙述部分试想当第一次阅读该文时，这里究竟是重要还是不重要？GRE阅读中的句子之间存在着密切的逻辑关系，一、定语从句结构定语从句要根据上下文进行的逻辑来判断定语从句有限定性和非限定性的区别，所谓限定性就是说从句部分是主句意义中不可或缺的部分，如:There is one point where I’d like your advice.(有一点想征求你的意见)这类从句如果拿掉剩下的部分就会意义不如上句将变为:There is a point.使人不明其意在译成汉语时这类从句一般译为从句(如上句)而非限定性是说从句部分只是对主句部分起到附加说明的作用，拿掉之后其他部分仍然可以成立如:I have many friends, some of whom can play guitar very well.(我有很多朋友，其中有些能弹一手好吉他)这类从句译为汉语时可译为一个并列的句子(如上句)记住定语从句和主句之间还存在着状语关系，所以其最为重要的作用就是用来表达原因、让步、目的、假设、定义等某一种关系所以在遇到这样的句子结构，不妨慢下速度来仔细分析一下其含义，这对把握句子所在的段落的大意是非常重要的，因为定语从句所表示的状语关系，很有可能是作者要表达的行文意图。

While this boundary does not mark the outer limit of a State’s territory, since in international law the territorial sea forms part of a State’s territory, it does represent the demarcation be。