美容院强迫顾客高额消费行为的定性——以杨某等人强迫交易案为例.doc

内容摘要随着我国市场经济的飞速发展，各种新兴的经营模式应运而生1997年《刑法》中 有关强迫交易罪的行为方式等规定显得相对不那么完善，从而由于立法的诸种不足导致 实务中对该类行为的处理不能很好的做到罚当其罪，很大程度上削弱了打击力度基于 上述原因，2011年通过的《刑法修正案(A)》对其行为方式进行了适应性的补充立 法修订反映了社会形势的发展变化对刑法提出了新的更高的要求，也表现了刑法与时俱 进的时代特点但由于立法及司法解释均未对木罪中“情节严重”的认定标准问题做出 统一具体的规定，导致本罪在司法实践的认定过程中出现了一些争议因此，笔者以江 苏自2002年至2011年十年来首例美容业强迫交易案为例，对强迫交易罪在实务中的具 体认定问题进行了探讨，通过介绍分歧观点、归纳争议焦点并在此基础上对各争议罪名 进行法理分析的方式，对本案认定过程中出现的争议分别予以冋应，最终得出本案应定 强迫交易罪的结论本文分为四个部分，共二万余字第一部分：案件的基本情况该部分首先说明了本案的案由以及对本案的案情做了简单的介绍之后着重描述了在案件审理过程中出现的各种分歧观点，即有人认为本案 屈于普通的民事欺诈；有人认为本案构成强迫交易罪；有人认为本案定抢劫罪更合适； 有人认为本案应定敲诈勒索罪；述有人认为本案应当认定为诈骗罪。

然后根据以上分歧 观点，总结出木案的争议焦点，即木案中被告的行为是否属于民事欺诈以及木案中被告 的行为构成强迫交易罪、抢劫罪、诈骗罪、还是敲诈勒索罪的争议第二部分：相关问题的法理分析该部分对基于第一部分中关于本案的争议焦点所 涉及的理论问题进行了较为深入的分析探讨包括对民事欺诈的定义及特征、抢劫罪、 敲诈勒索罪、诈骗罪、强迫交易罪的概念与特征的分析，而其中以对强迫交易罪的分析 为主Z后，对强迫交易罪与抢劫罪、敲诈勒索罪、诈骗罪的界定问题进行较为深入的 探讨通过以上分析论证，为下文对本案展开具体分析做好理论铺垫第三部分：本案的分析与结论该部分将紧密结合案件的基本情况，根据第二部分 的法理分析对本案的争议焦点问题逐一展开分析，不仅从反面排除本案中杨某等人不构 成抢劫罪、敲诈勒索罪以及诈骗罪，而且从正面进一步深入阐述了本案中杨某等人的行 为特征符合强迫交易罪的构成要件然后，在前述分析的基础上，得出本文的分析结论： 杨某等人的行为构成强迫交易罪第四部分：本案研究的启示本部分专门探讨强迫交易罪中“情节严重”的认定问 题首先说明由于对“情节严重”的认定标准不统一，带来了许多问题；接下来，介绍 了我国刑法学理论界对“情节严重”认定标准的不同看法；最后，提出自己关于“情节 严重”认定标准的具体考虑因素，作为对将来制定司法解释的参考。

关键词：强迫交易罪；民事欺诈；抢劫罪；诈骗罪；敲诈勒索罪；情节严重AbstractAs China t economy is experiencing a rapid development, all kinds of different emerging business model emerged. Behavior and other relevant provisions of the crime of forced trading in 1997nCriminal Law11 is relatively not so perfect, so due to the lack of legislation led to unite in practice deal with that type of behavior cannot be good to do a penalty when incrimination, a large extent weaken the crackdown. Base on the above reasons,the criminal law bill for amendment(eight) in 2011 made the adaptability revision to the behavior. Facing higher requirement caused by social development and change, the Criminal Law advances with times. Legislative amendments to reflect changes in the social situation of the development of the criminal law put forward higher requirements for the new, but also demonstrated the characteristics of the times Penal Times. However, the Provisions of the criminal code of the presentation too brief summary of the crime, leading to the crime of forced transactions occur in the process of recognition of some controversy. So the author take the first case of Jiangsu beauty salon forced transaction as the sample to explore and analyze the dispute during identified in the crime of forced trading through the approach of combing case analysis with legal analysis, eventually come to the conclusion given crime of forced trading.This paper is divided into four parts, about twenty thousand words.The first part: The basic circumstances of the case・ At first describe the case of the cause of action as well as the merits of the case made a brief introduction. After focusing on description of proceedings in the case appeared in a variety of divergent views: some people think that belong to ordinary civil fraud case; some people think that this case constitutes a crime of forced trading; some people think that the case be more appropriate for robbery; some people think that the case should be extortion; some people believe that the case should be regarded as fraud. Then according to various divergent views, summed up the case the focus of controversy: the controversy that the defendant^ conduct constitutes civil fraud or not and it constitutes forced trading, robbery, fraud, or extortion.The second part: Legal Analysis related issues. The first part of the section based on theoretical questions about the focus of controversy involved in the case were discussed more in-depth analysis. Analysis includes the definition and characteristics of civil fraud, robbery, extortion, fraud, crime of forced trading concepts and features, which to analyze the crime of forced trading dominated. Then more in-depth discuss on the definition of the crime of forced trading problem with robbery, extortion, fraud. Through the above analysis demonstrates, for the following specific analysis for the case to start doing theoretical groundwork.The third part: The divergent views and controversy of this case・ Then according to various divergent views, summed up the case the focus of controversy: the controversy that the defendant's conduct constitutes civil fraud or not and it constitutes forced trading, robbery, fraud, or extortion.The third part: The case analysis and conclusions- This section will focus on the second part of the controversial issues one by one to analyze in close connection with the basic circumstances of the case and in accordance with the related basic theory of criminal law and the provisions of "criminal law" for constituted conditions of each crime integrated with the documentation. Then not only excluded from the opposite case Yang, who do not constitute robbery, extortion and fraud, but also thorough described the behavioral characteristics of Yang, et al in this case further integration of the crime of fo。