2023年尖扎县考研《英语一》高分冲刺试卷含解析.doc

2023年尖扎县考研《英语一》高分冲刺试卷Section I Use of EnglishDirections:Read the following text. Choose the best word(s) for each numbered blank and mark A, B, C or D on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)In my childhood, I envied my classmates very much as my absence from school was not allowed due to my strict parents. I had to be 1 in order to stay home. My parents 2 to say that they were leading me to have a 3 work ethic(职业道德). Not until last week did I see the 4 ．I was on a bus, and behind was a man who was 5 to his friend about his life. His dream was to become a director but he wouldn't continue to 6 it because he had no 7 if he could make enough money. And he didn't want to waste 8 because it probably would take months or years to 9 it big. Then he admitted to thinking about becoming a(n) 10 because he thought he could 11 make six figures within one year. His friend agreed because as he put it, “I have no 12 to work long hours and not make much money. Taking pictures is good because you can make big money and only work short hours.”Many people these days don't 13 that when things seem to happen immediately, it is only because a lot of 14 , determination and time have gone into it. Someone once told me that you may know 15 someone is an expert in his given field by how easy he makes it look. The 16 it looks, the more hours go into it.There is no 17 for laziness. In the television show Fame, the dance teacher told her students, “If you want fame, fame 18 and here's how you start paying for it, in sweat.” Every time I watch that show, my dad would repeat how 19 she was because in order to 20 you have to work hard. He would go on and on about how bad it is to be lazy.1、A．shaking B．smiling C．shouting D．lying2、A．needed B．used C．agreed D．ought3、A．different B．reliable C．standard D．good4、A．evidence B．significance C．answer D．result5、A．writing B．explaining C．reflecting D．complaining6、A．support B．make C．follow D．change7、A．idea B．doubt C．evidence D．sign8、A．luck B．money C．time D．opportunity9、A．take B．promote C．make D．create10、A．dancer B．lawyer C．actor D．photographer11、A．gently B．eagerly C．easily D．carefully12、A．choice B．time C．desire D．chance13、A．understand B．guarantee C．recognize D．realize14、A．decision B．effort C．pressure D．intelligence15、A．that B．why C．whether D．when16、A．easier B．lighter C．better D．harder17、A．explanation B．statement C．excuse D．possibility18、A．matters B．arises C．works D．costs19、A．natural B．beautiful C．right D．kind20、A．succeed B．develop C．finish D．restSection II Reading ComprehensionPart ADirections:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing A, B, C or D. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1 It is generally acknowledged that young people from poorer socio-economic backgrounds tend to do less well in the education system. In an attempt to help the children of poor families, a nationwide program called “Headstart” was started in the US in 1965. A lot of money was poured into it. It took children into pre-school institutions at the age of three and was supposed to help them succeed in school. But the results have been disappointing , because the program began too late. Many children who entered it at three were already behind their peers in language and intelligence and the parents were not involved in the process. At the end of each day, “Headstart” children returned to the same disadvantaged home environment.To improve the results, another program was started in Missouri that concentrated on parents as the child,s first teachers. This program was based on research showing that working with the family is the most effective way of helping children get the best possible start in life. The four-year study included 380 families who were about to have their first child and represented different social-economic status, age and family structure. The program involved trained educators visiting and working with the parent or parents and the child. The program also gave the parents some guidance, and useful skills on child development.At three, the children involved in the “Missouri” program were evaluated with the children selected from the same socio-economic background and family situations. The results were obvious. The children in the program were more advanced in language development, problem solving and other intellectual skills than their peers. They performed equally well regardless of socio-economic backgrounds or family structure. The one factor that was found to affect the child,s development was the poor quality of parent-child interaction. That interaction was not necessarily bad in poorer famil。