2021考研英语真题及解析.pdf

20212021 考研英语（二）真题及答案考研英语（二）真题及答案Section IUse of EnglishIt's not difficult to set targets for staff. It is much harder, （1）to understand their negativeharder,consequences. Most work-related behaviors have multiple components.（2） one andthe others become distorted.Travel on a London bus and you'll （3） see how this works with drivers. Watchpeople get on and show their tickets. Are they carefully inspected? Never. Do people get onwithout paying? Of course! Are there inspectors to （4） that people have paid? Possibly, but veryfew.And people who run for the bus? They are（5）. How about jumping lights? Buses do soalmost as frequently as cyclists.Why? Because the target is（ 6 ）. People complained that buses were late and infrequent.（7）,the number of buses and bus lanes were increased, and drivers were （ 8） or punishedaccording to the time they took.And drivers hit these targets. But they（9） hit cyclists. If thetarget was changed to （10）you would have more inspectors and more sensitive pricing.If thecriterion changed to safety, you would get more （ 11 ）drivers who obeyed traffic laws.But boththese criteria would be at the expense of time.There is another （12） : people became immensely inventive in hitting targets. Have you （13 ）that you can leave on a flight an hour late but still arrive on time? Tailwinds? Of course not!Airlines have simply changed the time a （14） is meant to take. A one-hour flight is now billed as atwo-hour flight.The（15）of the story is simple. Most jobs are multidimensional, with multiple criteria.Choose one criterion and you may well （16）others. Everything can be done faster and madecheaper, but there is a （ 17 ） Setting targets can and does have unforeseen negativeconsequences.This is not an argument against target-setting. But it is an argument for exploringconsequences first. All good targets should have multiple criteria（18）critical factors such astime, money,, quality and customer feedback. The trick is not only to （19） just one or even twodimensions of the objective, but also to understand how to help people better （20） the objective.1.A. therefore B. again C. moreoverD.however2.A. identifyB.assess C.emphasizeD. explain3.A.curiously B.quickly C.eagerly D. nearly4.A. checkB.proveC. recall D. claim5.A. threatenedB.mockedC. ignoredD. blamed6.A. hospitalityB.competition C. punctualityD. innovation7.A. YetB.BesidesC. StillD. So8.A. rewarded B. trainedC.groupedD.hired9.A.ratherB.alsoC.onceD.only10.A. comfort B.efficiencyC. securityD.revenue11.A. cautious B. quietC. diligentD. friendly12.A. purpose B.prejudiceC. policy D. problem13.A. revealedB.noticedC.admittedD.reported14.A. breakB. departureC. transferD. trip15.A.moralB.background C.styleD.form16.A. sacrifice B. criticizeC. tolerateD.interpret17.A. secretB.costC.productD. task18.A. relating toB. calling forC. accounting forD. leading to19.A. predict B.restore C.specifyD.create20.A. reviewB. achieveC. presentD.modify答案：1-5 DCBAC 6-10 CAABD11-15 ADBDB 16-20 ABACBSection II Reading ComprehensionPart A Directions:Read the following four texts. Answer the questions below each text by choosing [A], [B], [C]or [D]. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (40 points)Text 1Text 1Reskilling is something that sounds like a buzzword but is actually a requirement if we planto have a future where a lot of would-be workers do not get left behind.We know we are moving into a period where the jobs in demand will change rapidly, as willthe requirements of the jobs that remain. Research by the WEF detailed in the Harvard BusinessReview, finds that on average 42 per cent of the core skills " within job roles will change by 2022.That is a very short timeline, so we can only imagine what the changes will be further in thefuture.The question of who should pay for reskilling is a thorny one For individual companies, thetemptation is always to let go of workers whose skills are no longer demand and replace themwith those whose skills are.That does not always happen.AT&T is often given as the gold standardof a company who decided to do a massive reskilling program rather than go with a fire -and-hirestrategy,ultimately retraining 18,000 employees. Prepandemic, other companies includingAmazon and Disney had also pledged to create their own plans. When the skills mismatch is inthe broader economy though, the focus usually turns to government to handle.Efforts in Canadaand elsewhere have been arguably languid at best, and have given us a situation where wefrequently hear of employers begging for workers even at times and In regions whereunemployment is high.With the pandemic, unemployment is very high indeed. In February.at 3.5 per cent and 5.5per cent respectively, unemployment rates in Canada and the United States were at generationallows and worker shortages were everywhere. As of May, those rates had spiked up to 13.3 percent and 13.7 per cent, and although many worker shortages had disappeared, not all had doneso. In the medical field, to take an obvious example, the pandemic meant that there were stillclear shortages of doctors,nurses and other medical personnelOf course, it is not like you can take an unemployed waiter and train him to be a doctor in afew weeks,no matter who pays for it. But even if you cannot close that gap,maybe you can closeothers, and doing so would be to the benefit of all concerned That seems to be the case inSweden, where the pandemic kick-started a retraining program where business as well asgovernment had a role.Reskilling in this way would be challenging in a North American context. You can easilyimagine a chorus of "you cant do that," because teachers or nurses or whoever have special skills,and using any support staff who has been quickly trained is bound to end in disaster. Maybe. Ormaybe it is something that can work 'ell in Sweden, with its history of co-operation betweenbusiness, labour and government, but not in North America where our history is verydifferent.Then again, maybe it is akin to wartime, when extraordinary things take place, but it isbusiness as usual after the fact. And yet, as in war the pandemic is teaching us that many things,including rapid reskilling, can be done if there is a will to do them. In any case Swedens workforce is now more skilled, in more things,and more flexible than it was before.Of course, reskilling programs, whether for pandemic needs or the post pandemic world, areexpensive and at a time when every ones budgets are lean this may not be the time toimplement them. Then again,extending income support programs to get us through the nextmonths is expensive, too, to say nothing of the cost of having a swath of long -term unemployedin the POST-COVID years Given that, perhaps we should think hard about whether the pandemiccan jump-start us to a place where res killing becomes much more than a buzzword.21. Research by the World Economic Forum suggests21. Research by the World Economic Forum suggests. .A. an increase in full-time employment B. an urgent demand for new job skillsC. a steady growth of job opportunitiesD. a controversy about the “core skills” 22.AT&T is cited to show .A.an alternative to the fire-and-hire strategyB.an immediate need for government supportC.the importance of staff appraisal standardsD.the characteristics of reskilling program23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada23.Efforts to resolve the skills mismatch in Canada.A.have driven up labour costsB.have proved to be inconsistentC.have met with fierce opposition D. have appeared to be insufficient24.We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there was24.We can learn from Paragraph 3 that there was. .A.a call for policy adjustmentB.a change in hiring practices C. a lack of medical workersD.a sign of economic recovery 25.Scandinavian Airlines decided to.A.Great job vacancies for the unemployedB.Prepare their laid-off workers for other jobs C.Retrain their cabin staff for better servicesD. finance their staff' s college educationText 2Text 2With the global population predicted to hit close to 10 billion by 2050, and forecasts thatagricultural production in, some regions will need to nearly double to keep pace, food security isincreasingly making headlines. In the UK, it has become a big talking point recently too, for ratherparticular reason: Brexit.Brexit is seen by some as an opportunity to reverse a recent trend towards the UK importingfood. The country produces only about 60 percent of the food it eats,down from almostthree-quarters in the late 1980s.A move back to self-sufficiency, the argument goes, would boostthe farming industry, political sovereignty and even the nation's health. Sounds great —but bowfeasible is this vision?According to a report on UK food production from the University of Leeds, UK,85 per cent ofthe country's total land area is associated with meat and dairy production. That supplies 80 percent of what is consumed, so even covering the whole country in livestock farms wouldn't allowus to cover all our meat and dairy needs.There are many caveats to those figures, but they are still grave. To become much more self -sufficient, the UK would need to drastically reduce its consumption of animal foods,and probablyalso farm more intensively—meaning fewer green fields, and more factory-style production.But switching to a mainly plant-based diet wouldn't help. There is a good reason why the UKis dominated by animal husbandry: most of its terrain doesn't have the right soil orclimate togrow crops on a commercial basis. Just 25 percent of the county's land is suitable forcrop-growing, most of which is already occupied by arable fields. Even if we converted all thesuitable land to fields of fruit and veg —which would involve taking out all the nature reservesand removing thousands of people from their homes—we would achieve only a 30 percent boostin crop production.Just 23 percent of the fruit and vegetables consumed in the UK are currently home -grown,so even with the most extreme measures we could meet only 30 percent of our fresh produceneeds. That is before we look for the space to grow the grains, sugars,seeds and oils that provideus with the vast bulk of our current calorie intake.26.Some people argue that food self26.Some people argue that food self- -sufficient in UK wouldsufficient in UK wouldA.be hindered by its population groundB.become a priority of governmentC.pose a challenge to its farming industryD. contribute to the nation's well-being27.The report by the University of Leeds shows that in the UK27.The report by the University of Leeds shows that in the UKA.farmland has been inefficiently utilizedB.factory-style production needs reformingC.most land is used for meat and dairy productionD.more green fields will be converted for farming28.Crop28.Crop- -growing in he UK is restricted due to_growing in he UK is restricted due to_A.its farming technologyB.its dietary tradition C. its natural conditionsD. its commercial interests29.It can be learned from the last paragraph that British people29.It can be learned from the last paragraph that British peopleA.rely largely on imports for fresh produceB.enjoy a steady rise in fruit consumptionC.are seeking effective ways to cut calorie intakeD.are trying to grow new varieties of grains30.The author's attitude to food self30.The author's attitude to food self- -sufficient in the UK issufficient in the UK isA.defensiveB.doubtfulC.tolerantD. optimisticText 3Text 3When Microsoft bought task management app Wunderlist andmobile calendar Sunrise in2015, it picked up two newcomers that were attracting considerable buzz in Silicon Valley.Microsoft’s own Office dominates the market for “productivity” software, but the start-upsrepresented a new wave of technology designed from the ground up for the smart phone world.Both apps, however, were later scrapped, after Microsoft said it had used their best featuresin its own products. Their teams of engineers stayed on, making them two of the many“acquit-hires”that the biggest companies have used to feed their insatiable hunger for techtalent.To Microsoft’s critics, the fates of Wunderlist and Sunrise are examples of a remorselessdrive by Big Tech to chew up any innovative companies that lie in their.path. “They bought the seedlings and closed them down,” complained Paul Arnold, apartner at San Francisco -based Switch Ventures, putting paid to businesses that might one dayturn into competitors. Microsoft declined to comment.Like other start-up investors, Mr Arnold’ s own business often depends on selling start-upsto larger tech companies, though he admits to mixed feelings about the result:“I think thesethings are good for me, if I put my selfish hat on. But are they good for the American economy? Idon’t know.”The US Federal Trade Commission says it wants to find the answer to that question. Thisweek, it asked the five most valuable US tech companies for information about their many smallacquisitions over the past decade. Although only a research project at this stage, the request hasraised the prospect of regulators wading into early-stage tech markets that until now have beenbeyond their reach.Given their combined market value of more than $5.5tn, rifling through such small deals —many of them much less prominent than Wunderlist and Sunrise—might seem beside the point.Between them, the five companies (Apple, Microsoft, Google, Amazon and Facebook) have spentan average of only $3.4bn a year on sub-$1bn acquisitions over the past five years—a drop in theocean compared with their massive financial reserves, and the more than $130bn of venturecapital that was invested in the US last year.However, critics say that the big companies use such deals to buy their most threateningpotential competitors before their businesses have a chance to gain momentum, in some casesas part of a “buy and kill”. tactic to simply close them down.31.What is true about Wunderlist and sunrise after their acquisitions31.What is true about Wunderlist and sunrise after their acquisitions. .A.Their market values declinedB.Their tech features improvedC. Their engineers were retainedD. Their products were re-priced32.Microsoft32.Microsoft’’s critics believe that the big tech companies tend tos critics believe that the big tech companies tend to . .A.ignore public opinionsB.treat new tech talent unfairlyC.exaggerate their product qualityD.eliminate their potential competitors33.Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might33.Paul Arnold is concerned that small acquisitions might. .A. harm the national economyB.worsen market competitionC.discourage start-up investorsD.weaken big tech companies34.The US Federal Trade Commission intend to34.The US Federal Trade Commission intend to . .A. examine small acquisitionsB. limit Big Tech' s expansionC. supervise start-ups' operationsD.encourage research collaboration35.For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisition have35.For the five biggest tech companies, their small acquisition have. .A. brought little financial pressureB.raised few management challengesC.set an example for future dealsD.generated considerable profitsText 4Text 4We’re fairly good at judging people based on first impressions, thin slices of experienceranging from a glimpse of a photo to a five -minute interaction, and deliberation can be not onlyextraneous but intrusive. In one study of the ability she dubbed “thin slicing.” The latepsychologist Nalini Ambady asked participants to watch silent 10-second video clips of professorsand to rate the instructor’ s overall effectiveness. Their ratings correlated strongly with students ’end-of-semester ratings.Another set of participants had to count backward from 1,000 by ninesas they watched the clips,occupying their conscious working memory. Their ratings were just asaccurate, demonstrating the intuitive nature of the social processing.Critically, another group was asked to spend a minute writing down reasons fortheir judgment,before giving the rating. Accuracy dropped dramatically.Ambady suspectedthat deliberation focused them on vivid but misleading cues, such as certain gestures ofutterances, rather than letting the complex interplay of subtle signals form a holistic impression.She found similar interference when participants watched 15-second clips of pairs of people andjudged whether they were strangers, friends, or dating partners.Other research shows we're better at detecting deception and sexual orientation from thinslices when we rely on intuition instead of reflection. “It’s as if you’ re driving a stick shift," saysJudith Hall,a psychologist at Northeastern University, "and if you start thinking about it too much,you can' t remember what you' re doing.But if you go on automatic pilot, you ’re fine.Much ofour social life is like that."Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences College students' ratings ofstrawberry jams and college courses aligned better with experts' opinions when the studentsweren't asked to analyze their rationale. And people made car -buying decisions that were bothobjectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelings ratherthan on details,but only if the decision was complex— when they had a lot of information toprocess.Intuition's special powers are unleashed only in certain circumstances. In one study,participants completed a battery of eight tasks, including four that tapped reflective thinking(discerning rules, comprehending vocabulary) and four that tapped intuition and creativity(generating new products or figures of speech).Then they rated the degree to which they hadused intuition ( “gut feelings,” “hunches,” “my heart” ). Use of their gut hurt their performanceon the first four tasks,as expected, and helped them on the rest Sometimes the heart is smarterthan the head.Other research shows we re better at detecting deception and sexual orientation from thinslices when we rely on intuition instead of reflection. "It' s as if you' re driving a stick shift," saysJudith Hall, a psychologist at Northeastern University,"and if you start thinking about it too much,you can't remember what you're doing. But if you go on automatic pilot, you re fine. Much of oursocial life is like that." Thinking too much can also harm our ability to form preferences Collegestudents ratings ofstrawberry jams and college courses aligned better with experts' opinions when thestudents weren't asked to analyze their rationale.And people made car-buying decisions thatwere both objectively better and more personally satisfying when asked to focus on their feelingsrather than on details, but only if the decision was complex-when they had a lot of information toprocess.36.Nalini Ambaby36.Nalini Ambaby’’s study deals withs study deals with. .A.instructor student interactionB.the power of people’s memoryC. the reliability of first impressionsD.People's ability to influence others37.In Ambaby 's study, rating accuracy dropped when participants37.In Ambaby 's study, rating accuracy dropped when participants .A.gave the rating in limited timeB. focused on specific detailsC. watched shorter video clipsD.discussed with on another38.Judith Hall mentions driving to mention that38.Judith Hall mentions driving to mention that . .A.memory can be selectiveB. reflection can be distractingC. social skills must be cultivatedD. deception is difficult to detect39.When you are making complex decisions, it is advisable to39.When you are making complex decisions, it is advisable to . .A. follow your feelingsB.list your preferencesC.seek expert adviceD.collect enough data40.What can we learn from the last paragraph?40.What can we learn from the last paragraph?A.Generating new products takes timeB. Intuition may affect reflective tasksC. Vocabulary comprehension needs creativity D. Objective thinking may boost intuitivenessPart B Directions:Part B Directions:Read the following text and answer the questions by choosing the most suitable subheadingfrom the list A-G for each numbered paragraphs (41-45). There are two extra subheadings whichyou do not need to use. Mark your answers on the ANSWER SHEET. (10 points)A.Stay calmB.Stay humbleC.Don' t make judgmentsD.Be realistic about the risksE.Decide whether to waitF.Ask permission to disagreeG.Identify a shared goalHow to Disagree with Someone more powerful than you.Your boss proposes a new initiativeyou think won’t work. Your senior colleague outlines a project timeline you think is unrealist.What do you say when you disagree with someone who has more power than you do? Howdo you decide whether it's worth speaking up? And if you do, what exactly should you say? Hereis how to disagree with someone more powerful than you.After this risk assessment, You may decide it’s best to hold off on voicing your opinion.Maybe you haven’ t finished thinking the problem through the whole discussion was a surprise toyou, or you want to get a clearer sense of what the group thinks. If you think other people aregoing to disagree too, you might want to gather your army first. People can contribute experienceor information to your thinking--all the things that would make the disagreement stronger ormore valid It' s also a good idea to delay the conversation if you re in a meeting or other publicspace. Discussing the issue in private will make the powerful person feel less threatened.Before you share your thoughts, think about what the powerful person cares about—it maybe “the credibility of their team of getting a project done on time. You' re more likely to beheard if you can connect your disagreement to a higher purpose. When you do speak up, don' tassume the link will be clear You ll want to state it overtly, contextualizing your statements sothat you re seen not as a disagreeable underling but as a colleague who' s trying to advance ashared goal. The discussion will then become more like a chess game than a boxing match, ” saysWeeksThis step may sound overly deferential, but it's a smart way to give the powerful personpsychological safety and control. You can say something like, I know we seem to be movingtoward a first-quarter commitment here i have reasons to think that won 't work i' d like to wayout my reasoning. Would that be ok? This gives the person a choice, allowing them to verballyopt in. And, assuming they say yes it will make you feel more confident about voicing youdisagreement.You might feel your heart racing or your face turning red but do whatever you can to remainneutral in both your words and actions. When your body language communicates reluctance oranxiety,it undercuts the message. It sends a mixed message, and your counterpart gets to choosewhat to read. Deep breaths can help, as can speaking more slowly and deliberately. When we feelpanicky we tend to talk louder and faster. Simply slowing the pace and talking in an even tonehelps the other person calm down and does the same or you. It also makes you seem confident,even if you aren’t.Emphasize that you re offering your opinion, not gospel truth.I may be a well-informed,well-researched opinion, but it's still an opinion, my talk tentativelyand slightly understate your confidence instead of saying something like,"If we set anend-of-quarter deadline, we'll never make it," say,This is just my opinion, but don’t see how wewill make that deadline. Having asserted your position(as a position, not as a fact)demonstrateequal curiosity about other views remind the person that this is your point of view and theninvite critique. Be open to hearing other opinions.Section III Translation46.Directions:Translate the following text into Chinese. Write your translation neatly on the ANSWERSHEET.(15 points)We tend to think that friends and family members are our biggest sources of connection,laughter and warmth. While that may well be true, researchers have also recently found thatinteracting with strangers actually brings a boost in mood and feelings of belong that we didn’texpect.In our series of studies, researchers instructed Chicago area commuters using publictransportation to strike up a conversation with someone near them. On average, participantswho followed the instruction felt better than those who had been told to stand or sit in silence.There searchers also argued that when we shy away from casual interaction with strangers, it isoften due to a misplaced anxiety that they might not want to talk to us. Much of the time,however, this belief is false. As it turns out, many people are actually perfectly willing to talk—and may even be flattered to receive your attention.【参考译文】我们通常认为朋友和家庭成员是我们交流， 快乐和温暖的最大源泉。

然而这或许是正确的 但是， 最近研究人员也发现与陌生人交流实际上可以改善情绪并找到出人意料的归属感在我们的一系列研究中， 研究人员建议， 芝加哥区域的通勤者可以借助乘坐公共交通工具与身边的人交流 通常来说， 那些听从指示的乘客远比那些被告知独自站立或静坐的人感觉要好得多 我们在日常生活中之所以羞于与陌生人交流是因为我们不恰当的焦虑感——他们或许不愿意和我们交流然而，大多数时候， 这个想法是错误的正如实验结果显示，很多人实际上非常乐意交流——甚至有可能因你的关注而感到满足Section IV Writing Part A47.Directions:Suppose you are organizing an online meeting. Write an email to Jack, an internationalstudent.1)invite him to participate, and2)tell him the detailsYou should write neatly on ANSWER SHEET 2.Do not sign your own name at the end of the e-mail. Use "Li Ming"instead.Do not write the address.(10 points)47.【作文范文】Dear Jack,My name is Li Ming, chairman of the Students ’ Union in our university. It is my honor toorganize the forthcoming online meeting on Chinese-European culture exchange, and I amwriting this email to cordially invite you to participate in this meeting.Due to the widespread impact of the current COVID -19 pandemic, it is been decided thatthis meeting will be hold online at 10 am this Saturday, via the software called Ten -cent Online.We are hoping that you could give us a 15 -minute talk about the culture in your motherland, orany culture shock you have experienced after coming to China. It doesn ’t have to be a formalone, but I believe it will definitely become meaningful information for us all.We truly hope you could give me a favorable reply, and leave us a wonderfulmemory in this meeting.Sincerely yours,Li Ming【参考范文译文】亲爱的杰克，我叫李明，我们大学学生会主席。

我很荣幸组织即将召开的中欧文化交流会议， 我写这封邮件是为了诚挚地邀请您参加这次会议由于目前的 COVID-19 疫情影响广泛， 会议决定于本周六上午 10 点通过名为腾讯的软件举行我们希望您能准备 15 分钟的演讲，谈谈您祖国的文化， 或者您来中国后所经历的任何文化冲击 它不必是一个正式的演说， 但我相信它一定会成为对所有人有意义的信息我们真诚地希望您能给我一个正面的答复，并在这次会议上给我们留下美好的回忆您真诚的李明【作文点评】首先， 从形式来讲， 2021 考研英语 （二） 小作文的出题形式基本和历年真题保持一致，给出一个简要的指导， 且依旧延续了历年小作文两点提纲的风格 其次， 从难易程度上来看，2021 考研英语（二）基本也和历年真题持平题目属于邀请信，围绕一个会议展开话题，具体来说就是邀请一位留学生“Jack”来参加“你”所筹办的一次会议题目中要求除了在信中表达邀请之外， 还要给出会议的一些细节信息 因此，考生在写信件主体段内容时，注意需要给出会议的主题、时间、方式、希望对方参与的活动等最后，有关会议的安排，仔细分析，跟 2015 年考研英语（二）小作文有相似之处，该年题目是关于大学运动会的通知，涉及活动必然要求写明活动起止时间、持续时间以及活动地点，所以， 认真备考过的考生在写第二点提纲时可以借鉴 2015 年背过的句式及表达进行写作。

Part B48.Directions:Write an essay based on the chart below. In your writing, you should1)interpret the chart, and2)give your commentsYou should write about 150 words on the ANSWER SHEET. (15 points)48.【作文范文】According to a survey on different ways for residents to do their physical exercises in acertain city, “doing exercise alone” accounts for more than half, namely 54.3%, which isfollowed by“exercising with friends” (47.7%). In comparison, fewer people (23.9%) choose to doexercise with families or join group activities (15.8%).A number of factors may account for the phenomenon. On one hand, with the increasingpressure people face in their work and life, most adults are occupied with loads of duties at workand piles of chores at home, thus it is quite difficult to make an appointment with friends or joina group to do physical exercise. Instead, they have to do it alone at any time suited to themselves.On the other, nowadays many young adults opt for working and living in a metropolis when theygrow up or graduate, far away from their hometown, which makes it almost impossible to do anyexercises with families.From the analysis above, a conclusion can be drawn that the trend of people doing physicalexercise solitarily may become more prevalent in the future.【参考范文译文】对某市居民体育锻炼方式的调查显示，“单独锻炼” 占一半以上， 占 54.3%， 其次是 “与朋友一起锻炼” （47.7%） 。

相比之下，选择与家人一起锻炼（23.9%） 或参加集体活动的人较少（15.8%） 有许多因素可以解释这一现象 一方面， 随着人们在工作和生活中面临的压力越来越大，大多数成年人在工作中要承担大量的工作，在家里要做大量的家务， 因此很难与朋友约个时间或参加一个团体进行体育锻炼 相反，他们必须在适合自己的任何时候单独做 另一方面， 现在许多年轻人长大或毕业后选择在远离家乡的大都市工作和生活， 这使得他们几乎不可能与家人一起锻炼身体通过以上的分析，可以得出结论：未来人们单独进行体育锻炼的趋势可能会更加普遍作文点评】在描述柱状图的时候，需要描写增加或者减少，同时还要描写趋势和状态， 接下来给大家提供一些如何描写这些变化的句子表示增减的动词：increase, go up, rise, soar up /decrease, decline, dwindle, reduce.开头的句子：1.the number data show---used at the beginning of the introduction or body paragraph2.the first...shows .... while the second... shows---used at the beginning of the introduction whenthere are two sets of data.3.the number of ... follows a remarkably similar trend---used at the beginning of a bodyparagraph to provide an overview when two ore more sets of data display similar trends描述趋势的句子：4.increased through out the period from.. to .. implies that the graph is linear 5.thenumber /amount of ...varied form最后写给大家的建议， 大家英语基础不好的情况下， 考英语一英语二的可以看看谭剑波的课，真的很不错，他会教你一些写阅读、写作的技巧，亲身经历，英语基础不好，考的英语二，考了 65 分，不高但我挺满意的，嘻嘻。