
2022年考博英语-复旦大学考前模拟强化练习题34(附答案详解).docx
17页2022年考博英语-复旦大学考前模拟强化练习题(附答案详解)1. 单选题Cream is a yellowish oil-in-water( )which forms When milk is allowed to stand.问题1选项A.emulsionB.albumenC.embrocationD.yolk【答案】A【解析】考查名词词义辨析emulsion“乳剂”;albumen“蛋白”;embrocation“擦剂”;yolk“蛋黄”句意:奶油是一种淡黄色的水包油乳剂,牛奶凝固就可形成奶油选项A符合题意2. 单选题In their( ) the groups old as many records as all the other groups in the country put together.问题1选项A.eulogyB.heydayC.summitD.mundaneness【答案】B【解析】eulogy“颂词”;heyday“全盛期”;summit“顶点”;mundaneness“世俗,平凡”句意:在他们的全盛时期,这个团队的销售量是本国其他所有团队的销售量总和选项B符合题意。
3. 单选题When I was sent to prison, I really felt I had ( )my parents( ) .问题1选项A.let...offB.let...downC.let...outD.let...alone【答案】B【解析】考查动词词组辨析let...off “放出,准许……暂停工作,宽恕”;let...down “使失望;辜负”;let...out “放出,泄漏”;let...alone “更不必说”句意:当我被送进监狱的时候,我真的觉得我让我爸妈失望了选项B符合题意4. 单选题Make sure you’re ( )him before you start sharing a house.问题1选项A.synonymous withB.compatible withC.subordinate toD.autonomous of【答案】B【解析】考查形容词词组辨析synonymous with “与……同义”;compatible with “与……和谐相处,与……相配的”;subordinate to “服从;从属于”;autonomous of “自主的”。
句意:在准备合租房子之前确定你跟他能和睦相处选项B符合题意5. 单选题In( )I wish I had thought about alternative courses of action.问题1选项A.retrospectB.disparityC.successionD.dissipation【答案】A【解析】考查名词词义辨析retrospect“回顾”,disparity“不同,不等”;succession“连续”,dissipation“浪费,消散”in retrospect是固定搭配,意思是“回顾往事;检讨过去”,句意:回想过去,我希望我曾想过这个行动的不同方案选项A符合题意6. 单选题In the busy holiday season, extra buses are provided to( )the existing service.问题1选项A.supplementB.complementC.implementD.experiment【答案】A【解析】考查名词词义辨析supplement“补充,增补”;complement“补足,补助”;implement“实现,执行”;experiment“尝试,进行试验”。
句意:在繁忙的假日,会增加一些公车来满足现有的服务选项A符合题意 7. 单选题He saw university as a community of scholars, where students were ( )by teachers into an appreciation of different philosophical approaches.问题1选项A.extractedB.deductedC.inductedD.conducted【答案】C【解析】考查动词辨析extracted “提取”;deducted “扣除,减去;演绎”;inducted “引导;感应”;conducted “管理,引导;表现”induct 和conduct都有“引导”的意思,但是前者有教授知识的意味,所以选项C符合题意8. 翻译题我认为没有人不喜欢到处去看看:多看看他人,多阅他乡,不但可以认识世界,亦可认识自己有人旅行时乘豪华游轮,谢灵运再世大概也会如此有人背负行囊,翻山越岭;有人骑自行车环游天下这些都令人羡慕我所倾向的,却是驾车长征,去看天涯海角我的太太比我更爱旅行,所以夫妻两人正好互做旅伴,这一点只怕徐霞客也要羡慕。
不过徐霞客是大旅行家、大探险家,我们,只是浅游而已答案】In my mind, everybody loves to look around, meeting more people and visiting more places. They cannot only understand the world, but also recognize themselves. Some of them traveled by a cruise, and Xie Lingyun may be one of them if he would reincarnate. Some picked up the traveling bag across the mountains. Some traveled around the world by bike. All of these are enviable. I just prefer to drive a long journey and see the ends of the earth. My wife is fond of traveling than I, and therefore we two are traveling companion, which may be envied by Xu Xiake. But Xu is a great traveler and explorer. We only superficially travel. 9. 单选题How about a glass of orange juice to( ) your thirst?问题1选项A.quenchB.quellC.quashD.quieten【答案】A【解析】考查动词词义辨析。
quench“压制,抑制,止(渴)”;quell“镇压,平息,压制”;quash“取消;废除;镇压”;quieten“安静,抚慰”句意:用杯橙汁来止渴怎么样?选项A符合题意10. 单选题Employees knew from the very( )that their jobs would finish this year.问题1选项A.upshotB.outbreakC.outcomeD.outset【答案】D【解析】考查形似词词义辨析upshot“结局,结果”;outbreak“(战争的)爆发”;outcome“结果,结局”;outset“开始,开端”句意:员工从开始就知道他们的工作今年就会结束选项D符合题意11. 单选题On January, 11th, 2009, a remarkable legal case opens in a San Francisco courtroom — on its way, it seems almost certain, to the Supreme Court. Perry v. Schwarzenegger challenges the constitutionality of Proposition 8, the California referendum that, in November, 2008, overturned a State Supreme Court decision allowing same-sex couples to marry. Its lead lawyers are unlikely allies: Theodore B. Olson, the former solicitor general under President George W. Bush, and a prominent conservative; and David Boies, the Democratic trial lawyer who was his opposing counsel in Bush v. Gore. The two are mounting an ambitious case that pointedly circumvents the incremental, narrowly crafted legal gambits and the careful state-by-state strategy that leading gay-rights organizations have championed in the fight for marriage equality. The Olson Boies team hopes for a ruling that will transform the legal and social landscape nationwide, something on the order of Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, or Loving v. Virginia the landmark 1967 Supreme Court ruling that invalidated laws prohibiting interracial marriage.Olson’s interest in this case has puzzled quite a few people. What’s in it for him? Is he sincere? Does he really think he can sway the current Course? But when I spoke with Olson, who is sixty-nine, in early December, he sounded confident and impassioned; the case clearly fascinate。
