
雅各布作文评分量表(共2页).doc
2页精选优质文档-----倾情为你奉上雅各布作文评分量表(Jacobs et al. 1981)DescriptorsScore LevelCriterial Knowledgeablel Substantivel Thorough development of thesisl Relevant to assigned topicCONTENT30-27Excellent to very good: knowledgeable * substantive * thorough development of thesis * relevant to assigned topic26-22Good to average: some knowledge of subject * adequate range * limited development of thesis * mostly relevant to topic, but lacks detail21-17Fair to poor: limited knowledge of subject * little substance * inadequate development of topic16-13Very poor: does not show knowledge of subject * non-substantive * not pertinent * OR not enough to evaluatel Fluent expressionl Ideas clearly stated/ supportedl Succinctl Well-organizedl Logical sequencingl Cohesive ORGANIZATION20-18Excellent to very good: fluent expression * ideas clearly stated/supported * succinct * well-organized * logical sequencing * cohesive17-14Good to average: somewhat choppy * loosely organized but main ideas stand out * limited support * logical but incomplete sequencing13-10Fair to poor: nonfluent * ideas confused or disconnected * lacks logical sequencing and development9-7Very poor: does not communicate * no organization * OR not enough to evaluatel Sophisticated rangel Effective word/idiom choice and usagel Word form masteryl Appropriate registerVOCABULARY20-18Excellent to very good: sophisticated range * effective word/idiom choice and usage * word form mastery * appropriate register17-14Good to average: adequate range * occasional errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured13-10Fair to poor: limited range * frequent errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage * meaning confused or obscured9-7Very poor: essentially translation * little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word form * OR not enough to evaluatel Effective complex constructionsl Agreementl Tensel Numberl Word order / functionUSE25-22Excellent to very good: effective complex constructions * few errors of agreement, tense, number, word order /function, articles, pronouns, prepositions21-18Good to average: effective but simple constructions * minor problems in complex constructions * several errors of agreement, tense, number, word order /function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscuredLANGUAGE17-11Fair to poor: major problems in simple/complex constructions * frequent errors of negation, agreement, tense, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments, run-ons, deletions * meaning confused or obscured10-5Very poor: virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules * dominated by errors * does not communicate * OR not enough to evaluatel Spellingl Punctuationl Capitalizationl Paragraphingl Handwriting MECHANICS5Excellent to very good: demonstrates mastery of conventions * few errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing4Good to average: occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured3Fair to poor: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing * poor handwriting * meaning confused or obscured2Very poor: no mastery of conventions * dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing * handwriting illegible * OR not enough to evaluateTotal scores: 34-52: very poor52-68: poor to fair68-83: average to good83-100: very good to excellent专心---专注---专业。












