on_the_role_of_language_input_and_language_output_in_second_language_acquisition英语毕业论文.doc

毕业论文On the Role of Language Input and Language Output in Second Language Acquisition毕业论文毕业论文诚信承诺书诚信承诺书本人本人郑郑重承重承诺诺： ：我所呈交的毕业论文On the Role of Language Input and Language Output in Second Language Acquisition是在指导教师的指导下，独立开展研究取得的成果，文中引用他人的观点和材料，均在文后按顺序列出其参考文献，论文使用的数据真实可靠北京理工大学珠海学院 2010 届本科生毕业论文IOn the Role of Language Input and Language Output in Second Language AcquisitionABSTRACTNowadays, the phenomenon of fake prosperity in language teaching in China has sparked a hot debate. Many language learners who take part in exams such as IELTS and BEC find that it is difficult to get a high score in speaking and writing compared to listening and reading. In addition, many college students who passed the exam of CET4 and CET6 cannot use English appropriately, even though they have learned this language for over 10 years. The root of this phenomenon is that Chinese students always neglect the importance of achieving a balance between language input and language out in second language acquisition. This paper mainly analyses the reason why language learners should pay attention to the balance between language input and language output, as well as the important role of language input and language output in second language acquisitionKey Words: language input language output second language acquisition北京理工大学珠海学院 2010 届本科生毕业论文II试论语言输入与语言输出在二语习得中的作用试论语言输入与语言输出在二语习得中的作用摘摘 要要如今，我国外语教学“假繁荣”现象十分严重，学习外语者比比皆是，可是实际数据 显示我国学生在参加国外考试如雅思，BEC 等考试时，相比起听力与阅读部分，口语以及 写作部分的成绩偏低。

另外，有许多通过英语大学四六级考试的学生感叹自己学的是 “哑巴英语”,所学的内容不会运用，不能与人交流究其原因，是因为许多语言学习者 在第二语言习得过程中，忽略了语言学习的本质，更突出的问题是割裂了“语言输入” 与“语言输出”之间的关系，在外语学习的过程中没有给予两者同等的重视有鉴于此， 通过学习 Krashen 的语言输入理论以及 swain 的语言输出理论，笔者意图通过本研究揭 示“语言输入”与“语言输出”在外语教学过程中的关系与作用及其两者间的平衡对二 语习得产生的重要性，并借此提高广大外语学习者对此的重视程度摘要摘要：语言输入 语言输出 二语习得 北京理工大学珠海学院 2010 届本科生毕业论文IIIContentsAbstract……………………………………………………..…………….Ⅰ摘要……………………………………………………….………..…….ⅡLiterature Review..............................................................................………………........11.1 Input Hypothesis…………………………………………………....…….…11.1.1 An Overview of Input………………...…………..…..………...…….……31.1.2 The Limitations of Input Hypothesis...................................................…....31.2 Output Hypothesis………………………………………………..….………41.2.1 Definition of Output…………………………………………….…….…...41.2.2 An Overview of Comprehensible Output Hypothesis…..............................41.2.3 Functions of Output……………………………………………….…..…...51.2.3.1 The “Noticing/Triggering” Function………………………….………....51.2.3.2 Hypothesis Testing……………………………….………………..…….61.2.3.3 The Meta-linguistic Function…………………….………….……..……6ⅡⅡClarification of Relevant Concepts..............................................….... 92.1 Acquisition VS. Learning…………………………………………..….........9 2.2Second Language VS. Foreign Language……………………...…..……….10ⅢⅢThe Relationship between Input and Output……………...…..….......113.1 Input Precedes Output…...............................................................................13 3.2Output Supplements Input…………………...……………...............………14ⅣⅣThe Balance between Language Input and Language Output in TEFL Classes for Chinese Students…………………………..…...…17北京理工大学珠海学院 2010 届本科生毕业论文IV4.1 The Importance of Balance between Language Input and Language Output…........................................................................................................184.2 Classroom Activities………………………………...…….………………..194.2.1 Roughly-tuned Input………………………………...……………...…….204.2.2 Finely-tuned Input…………………………………...………………...…214.2.3 Communicative Output……………………………………………….......21ⅤⅤConclusion………………………………………….……………........22References…………………………………………...…………...………23 Acknowledgements………………………………….…………….….....24北京理工大学珠海学院 2010 届本科生毕业论文1ⅠⅠ Literature Review1.1 Input HypothesisInput Hypothesis, advanced by Krashen, a famous American applied linguist, in the late 1970s and the early 1980s, is an all-round theory concerning second language acquisition (SLA). Meanwhile, it is the most influential and controversial theory in second language acquisition research. Such influences still exist till now. Krashen’s Input Hypothesis is similar to Chomsky’s theory on first language acquisition in some respects, such as the function of Language Acquisition Device (LAD) in the process of language learning.Krashen states that language input plays an identical part with Language Acquisition Device. Together with language input, a learner can construct a series of internal expressions of a good language, in other words, construct an independent language system outside the learner’s first language (Jia Guanjie, 1996).According to Krashen, an important condition for language acquisition to occur is that the acquirer understands (via hearing and reading) input language that contains structure “a bit beyond” his or her current level of competence. In other words, the language which learners are exposed to should be just far enough beyond their current competence that they can understand most of it but is still c。