TPO3托福综合写作解析.docx

TPO3 托福综合写作解析作为备考托福的神器，TPO 系列在广大考生心中有着重要的地位当然，在备考托福中，也扮演着重要的角色前程百利小编今天和大家分享的是 TPO3TPO3 托福综合写作托福综合写作部分小编对托福写作中的综合写作中的阅读和听力部分，分别进行解析，最后还有优秀的范文哦！还在等什么，大家一起备考吧！TPO3TPO3 综合写作阅读部分：综合写作阅读部分：Rembrandt is the most famous of the seventeenth-century Dutch painters. However, there are doubts whether some paintings attributed to Rembrandt were actually painted by him. One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt. But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.First, there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed. She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford. Rembrandt, who was known for his attention to the details of his subjects’ clothing, would not have been guilty of such an inconsistency.Second, Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together. The face appears to be illuminated by light reflected onto it from below. But below the face is the dark fur collar, which would absorb light rather than reflect it. So the face should appear partially in shadow-which is not how it appears. Rembrandt would never have made such an error.Finally, examination of the back of the painting reveals that it was painted on a panel made of several pieces of wood glued together. Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood.For these reasons the painting was removed from the official catalog of Rembrandt’s paintings in the 1930s.( (一一) )下面是阅读部分常遇到的疑难词解释，希望能帮助大家更好的理解文章的内容：下面是阅读部分常遇到的疑难词解释，希望能帮助大家更好的理解文章的内容：1. Rembrandt ['rembrɑ:nt] n. 伦布兰特(姓氏)2. inconsistent [ɪnkən'sɪst(ə)nt]adj. 不一致的；前后矛盾的3. linen [['lɪnɪn]]n. 亚麻布，亚麻线；亚麻制品adj. 亚麻的；亚麻布制的n. (Linen)人名；(英)利嫩4. panel ['pæn(ə)l]n. 仪表板；嵌板；座谈小组，全体陪审员vt. 嵌镶板n. (Panel)人名；(英、法)帕内尔5. catalog [['kætəlɒɡ]]n. [图情][计] 目录；登记vi. 编目录；按确定价格收入目录(等于 catalogue)vt. 登记；为编目录( (二二) )以下是对阅读文章中出现的长难句的解析：以下是对阅读文章中出现的长难句的解析：1. 位于阅读第一段：One such painting is known as attributed to Rembrandt because of its style, and indeed the representation of the woman’s face is very much like that of portraits known to be by Rembrandt.解析：这句话解释说其中有一幅画因画风而被认为是伦布兰特的作品，并且，就这幅画中女性的面部体现而言，也确实是伦布兰特的刻画风格。

Such 是形容词，修饰后面的 painting，be known as 表示“被认为是…”；这个句子并没有涉及很多的语法，而是一些简单的词组连接而成2. 位于阅读第二段：She is wearing a white linen cap of a kind that only servants would wear-yet the coat she is wearing has a luxurious fur collar that no servant could afford.解析：句子中的 of 后面部分修饰 cap，of 表示“…的”；a kind 后面的 that 作为关系代词，引导非限制性定语从句，和第二个 that 的用法一样3.位于阅读最后一段：Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood.解析：句子是 although 引导的从句表示“尽管”的意思，后半句表示“但是”的意思。

两句是转折的关系 (三三) )阅读文章组织结构解析阅读文章组织结构解析文章以“总—分”的结构解释了为什么这幅作品非 Rembrandt 所作总论点：文章第一段最后一句：But there are problems with the painting that suggest it could not be a work by Rembrandt.(有几处问题说明这幅作品不是 Rembrandt 所作)分论点 1：第二段第一句：there is something inconsistent about the way the woman in the portrait is dressed.(画中女士的穿着不协调，而 Rembrandt 不会犯这样的错误)分论点 2：第三段第一句：Rembrandt was a master of painting light and shadow, but in this painting these elements do not fit together.(作品的明暗色调不协调)分论点 3：最后一段最后一句：Although Rembrandt often painted on wood panels, no painting known to be by Rembrandt uses a panel glued together in this way from several pieces of wood.(画板是木头拼接而成，不是 Rembrandt 的风格)阅读文章的内容首先否定了作品是 Rembrandt 所作，然后从三个方面做出分析。

下面是听力文本部分，我们来看看，又有什么观点和支持的论点呢听力文本部分：听力文本部分：Professor:Everything you just read about “Portrait of an Elderly Woman in a White Bonnet“ is true, and yet after a thorough re-examination of the painting, a panel of experts has recently concluded that it's indeed a work by Rembrandt. Here is why.First, the fur collar. X-rays and analysis of the pigments in the paint have shown that the fur collar wasn't part of the original painting. The fur collar was painted over the top of the original painting about a hundred years after the painting was made. Why? Someone probably wanted to increase the value of the painting by making it look like a formal portrait of an aristocratic lady.Second, the supposed error with light and shadow. Once the paint of the added fur color was removed, the original could be seen, in the original painting, the woman is wearing a simple collar of light-colored cloth. The light-colored cloth of this collar reflects light that illuminates part of the woman's face. That's why the face is not in partial shadow. So in the original painting, light and shadow are very realistic and just what we w。