2014年北京航空航天大学考博英语真题解析答案笔记
-
资源ID:61040429
资源大小:559.21KB
全文页数:15页
- 资源格式: PDF
下载积分:0金贝
快捷下载
账号登录下载
微信登录下载
微信扫一扫登录
1、金锄头文库是“C2C”交易模式,即卖家上传的文档直接由买家下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益全部归上传人(卖家)所有,作为网络服务商,若您的权利被侵害请及时联系右侧客服;
2、如你看到网页展示的文档有jinchutou.com水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对部份页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有jinchutou.com水印标识,下载后原文更清晰;
3、所有的PPT和DOC文档都被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买;
4、文档大部份都是可以预览的,金锄头文库作为内容存储提供商,无法对各卖家所售文档的真实性、完整性、准确性以及专业性等问题提供审核和保证,请慎重购买;
5、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据;
6、如果您还有什么不清楚的或需要我们协助,可以点击右侧栏的客服。
|
下载须知 | 常见问题汇总
|
2014年北京航空航天大学考博英语真题解析答案笔记
育明考研考博培训中育明考研考博培训中心官网:心官网:www.yumingedu.comwww.yumingedu.com 北北京航空航天大学京航空航天大学 2014 年考博英语年考博英语试题试题 Part One: Reading Comprehension Directions: There are four passages in this part. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them, there are 4 choices marked A, B, C and D. Read the passages carefully and decide on the best choice. Then mark the corresponding letter on the ANSWER SHEET with a single line through the center. Passage 1 A controversy erupted in the scientific community in early 1998 over the use of DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid ) fingerprinting in criminal investigations. DNA fingerprinting was introduced in 1987 as a method to ident(wechat:13370142852)ify individuals based on a pattern seen in their DNA, the molecule of which genes are made. DNA is present in every cell of the body except red blood cells. DNA fingerprinting has been used successfully in various ways, such as to determine paternity where it is not clear who the father of a particular child is. However, it is in the area of criminal investigations that DNA fingerprinting has potentially powerful and controversial uses. DNA fingerprinting and other DNA analysis techniques have revolutionized criminal investigations by giving investigators powerful new tools in the attempt to trove guilt, not just establish innocence. When used in criminal investigations, a DNA fingerprint pattern from a suspect is compared with a DNA fingerprint pattern obtained from such material as hairs or blood found at the scene of a crime. A match between the two DNA samples can be used as evidence to convict a suspect. The controversy in 1998 stemmed form a report published in December 1991 by population geneticists Richard C. Lewontin of Harvard University in Cambridge, Mass., and Daniel L. Hartl called into question the methods to calculate how likely it is that a match between two DNA fingerprints might occur by chance alone. In particular, they argued that the current method cannot properly determine the likelihood that two DNA samples will match because they came from the same individual rather than simply from two different individuals who are members of the same ethnic group. Lewontin and Hartl called for better surveys of DNA patterns methods are adequate. In response to their criticisms, population geneticists Ranajit Chakraborty of the University of Texas in Dallas and Kenneth K.Kidd of Yale University in New Haven, Conn., argued that enough data are already available to show that the methods currently being used are adequate. In January 1998, however, the federal Bureau of Investigation and laboratories that conduct DNA tests announced that they would collect additional DNA samples form various ethnic groups in an attempt to resolve some of these questions. And, in April, a National Academy of Sciences called for strict standards and system of accreditation for DNA testing laboratories. 1 . Before DNA fingerprinting is used, suspects _ A. would have to leave their fingerprints for further investigations B. would have to submit evidence for their innocence C. could easily escape conviction of guilt 育明考研考博培训中育明考研考博培训中心官网:心官网:www.yumingedu.comwww.yumingedu.com D. could be convicted of guilt as well . 2. DNA fingerprinting can be unreliable when _ . A. the methods used for blood-cell calculation are not accurate B. two different individuals of the same ethnic group may have the same DNA fingerprinting pattern C. a match is by chance left with fingerprints that happen to belong to two different individuals D. two different individuals leave two DNA samples 3. To geneticists like Lewontin and Hartl, the currcnt method _ A. is not so convincing as to exclude the likc:1iliood that two DNA samples can never come from two individuals B. is arguable because two individuals of the same ethnic group are likely to have the san DNA pattern C. is not based on adequate scientific theory of genetics D. is theoretically contradictory to what they have been studying 4. The attitude of the Federal Bureau of Investigation shows that _ A. enough data are yet to be collected from various ethnic groups to confirm the unlikelihood of two DNA samples coming from two individual members B. enough data of DNA samples should be collected to confirm that only DNA samples from the same person can match C. enough data are yet to be collected from various ethnic groups to determine the likelihood of two different DNA samples coming from the same person D. additional samples from various ethnic groups should be collected to determine that two DNA samples are unlikely to come from the same person 5. National Academy of Sciences holds the stance that _ A. DNA testing should be systematized B. only authorized laboratories can conduct DNA testing C. the academy only is authorized to work out standards for testing D. the academy has the right to accredit laboratories for DNA testing Passage 2 Racke