电子文档交易市场
安卓APP | ios版本
电子文档交易市场
安卓APP | ios版本
换一换
首页 金锄头文库 > 资源分类 > PPT文档下载
分享到微信 分享到微博 分享到QQ空间

高级投资项目管理和经济效益评价

  • 资源ID:48602283       资源大小:285.01KB        全文页数:75页
  • 资源格式: PPT        下载积分:12金贝
快捷下载 游客一键下载
账号登录下载
微信登录下载
三方登录下载: 微信开放平台登录   支付宝登录   QQ登录  
二维码
微信扫一扫登录
下载资源需要12金贝
邮箱/手机:
温馨提示:
快捷下载时,用户名和密码都是您填写的邮箱或者手机号,方便查询和重复下载(系统自动生成)。
如填写123,账号就是123,密码也是123。
支付方式: 支付宝    微信支付   
验证码:   换一换

 
账号:
密码:
验证码:   换一换
  忘记密码?
    
1、金锄头文库是“C2C”交易模式,即卖家上传的文档直接由买家下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益全部归上传人(卖家)所有,作为网络服务商,若您的权利被侵害请及时联系右侧客服;
2、如你看到网页展示的文档有jinchutou.com水印,是因预览和防盗链等技术需要对部份页面进行转换压缩成图而已,我们并不对上传的文档进行任何编辑或修改,文档下载后都不会有jinchutou.com水印标识,下载后原文更清晰;
3、所有的PPT和DOC文档都被视为“模板”,允许上传人保留章节、目录结构的情况下删减部份的内容;下载前须认真查看,确认无误后再购买;
4、文档大部份都是可以预览的,金锄头文库作为内容存储提供商,无法对各卖家所售文档的真实性、完整性、准确性以及专业性等问题提供审核和保证,请慎重购买;
5、文档的总页数、文档格式和文档大小以系统显示为准(内容中显示的页数不一定正确),网站客服只以系统显示的页数、文件格式、文档大小作为仲裁依据;
6、如果您还有什么不清楚的或需要我们协助,可以点击右侧栏的客服。
下载须知 | 常见问题汇总

高级投资项目管理和经济效益评价

厦门大学管理学院博士研究生课程报告八高级投资项目管理和经济效益评价 理论、方法和实践厦门大学管理学院 吴世农 Advanced Capital Budgeting Theory, Methods Budgeting=Plan detailing projected cash inflows and outflows during some future period, thus “Capital Budgeting” outlines the planned expenditures on fixed assets. 1. Multi-concepts for Capital Budgeting(1) Capital Investment Analysis by IRR (or PVI) B is over A. This case is typical as a conflict raised from decision criteria by NPV or by IRR? 厦门大学吴世农(2) Solution Since K=10% is assumed to be fixed, we can solve this conflict by creating a differential project (B-A), if the differential project yields a positive NPV, it is obvious that B is better than A because not only a part of B will create a NPV equal to NPVA, but also create a positive NPV for the differential project (B-A). Thus, we create a differential project (B-A), and then calculate its NPV and IRRNPV(B-A) = (75000-8000)/(1+10%)-(50000-5000)=$15909(75000-8000)/(1+IRR(B-A) )=(50000-5000), IRR(B-A) =48.8% No doubt, the results above suggests that the investors of the firm will be better off if project B is accepted.Advanced Topics in Capital Budgeting2. Trend Effect of NCF on NPV and IRR(1) ConflictWhich One is a Sounding Decision Rule? Suppose there are two mutually exclusive projects, A and B, the following graphs show that the trend of As NCFs and the trend of Bs NCFs are different. Obviously, graph 1 states that As NCFs are always larger than Bs NCFs over the periods, thus, NPVA>NPVB; graph 2 states for the earlier periods As NCFs are larger than Bs NCFs, thus NPVA > NPVB, but for the later periods (after K*) As NCFs are smaller than Bs NCFs, thus NPVANPV B B ANPVA 0, so the project should be accepted! (b) Should be the project be abandoned after its operation?Yes, because the projects NCFs rend to decline year by year!(c) When to abandon the project?The firm should abandon the project when the NPV is maximized! The following Calculation show Max(NPV) appears when n=3. Why? Advanced Topics in Capital Budgeting(c-1) NPV for 5-year Operation:NPV= 5000(0.909)+4000(0.826)+3000(0.751)+2000(0.683)+1000(0.621)-10000 = $2089 (c-2) NPV for 4-year Operation:NPV= 5000(0.909)+4000(0.826)+3000(0.751)+2000(0.683)+1000(0.683)- -10000 = $2157 (c-3) NPV for 3-year Operation:NPV= 5000(0.909)+4000(0.826)+3000(0.751)+3000(0.751)-10000= $2355=Max(NPV) (c-4) NPV for 2-year Operation:NPV= 5000(0.909)+4000(0.826)+5000(0.826)-10000= $1979(c-5) NPV for 1-year Operation:NPV= 5000(0.909)+7000(0.909)-10000= $908厦门大学吴世农(2) Project Abandonment Under UncertaintySuppose that a firm considers a project which initial outlay is $10000, K=10%, n=2, and its NCFs and associated probabilities were shown in the previous section (see IV). If the firm expected that salvage value(F) by the end of period 1 is $3000 while nothing left by the end of period 2, will this project is acceptable? If yes, should be it abandoned after operation?(a) Is the project acceptable?By computation from Section IV, E(NPV)>0, so the project must be accepted!E(NPV)=4623(63%)+3797(27%)+(-6530)(5%)+(-7356)(5%)=$3242S(NPV)= (NPVj -3242)2 Probability1/2 =$3254 (b) When to Abandon the Project? Year1 or Year2?(b-1): If the project is abandoned at the end of year 2, then E(NPV)=$3242S(NPV)=$3254 Advanced Topics in Capital Budgeting(b-2): If the project is abandoned at the end of year 1, then E(NPV)=4623(63%)+3797(27%)+(-5455)(5%)+(-5455)(5%)=$3392S(NPV)= (NPVj -3392)2 Probability1/2 =$2971The results above come from the following table:State NPVj Probability1 -1000+7000(0.909)+10000(0.826)=4624 0.63 2 -1000+7000(0.909)+ 9000(0.826)=3797 0.27 3 -1000+(2000+3000)(0.909) =-5455 0.05 4 -1000+(2000+3000)(0.909) =-5455 0.05Total 1.00 (b-3) Decisions The first, the results suggest that abandoning the project at the end of year 1 shows a larger NPV and less standard deviation by a comparison to NPV and standard deviation resulted from abandoning the project at the end of year 2, so the project should be abandoned at the end of year1. 厦门大学吴世农The second, the project will not be abandoned by the end of year 1 if the NCF=$70000 in the first year, but will be abandoned if the NCF = $2000 in the first year. (3) Optimal Project Life for Continuos Variable in Capital Budgeting(a) Continuos Variable in Capital BudgetingIn practice, some firm may be faced with some capital budgeting problems which variables such as price, profit and cash flow are continuous variables, for instance, brewery industry, forests plantation, raising chicken, and son on. There are two ques

注意事项

本文(高级投资项目管理和经济效益评价)为本站会员(lizhe****0920)主动上传,金锄头文库仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。 若此文所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即阅读金锄头文库的“版权提示”【网址:https://www.jinchutou.com/h-59.html】,按提示上传提交保证函及证明材料,经审查核实后我们立即给予删除!

温馨提示:如果因为网速或其他原因下载失败请重新下载,重复下载不扣分。




关于金锄头网 - 版权申诉 - 免责声明 - 诚邀英才 - 联系我们
手机版 | 川公网安备 51140202000112号 | 经营许可证(蜀ICP备13022795号)
©2008-2016 by Sichuan Goldhoe Inc. All Rights Reserved.